Home
HOME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
The Gerontologist 40:706-717 (2000)
© 2000 The Gerontological Society of America

Contextual or General Stress Outcomes

Making Choices Through Caregiving Appraisals

Valerie Braithwaite, PhDa

a Research School of Social Sciences, The Australian National University, Canberra

Correspondence: Valerie Braithwaite, PhD, Research School of the Social Sciences, The Australian National University, Canberra, A.C.T., Australia, 0200. E-mail: Valerie.Braithwaite{at}anu.edu.au.

Vernon L. Greene, PhD

This study contributes to the debate on general versus contextual measures of caregiver well-being through examining the differential relationships of caregiving appraisals to outcomes. Six dimensions of caregiving appraisal were examined as predictors of minor psychiatric symptoms, affect balance, and burden. Burden was high, symptoms were high, and affect was poor when caregivers held appraisals that reflected (a) low personal resiliency and (b) a conflict-ridden and dysfunctional relationship with the care receiver. When caregivers reported expending (c) considerable energy in maintaining their social networks, burden was also high, with some risk of symptoms, but affect was positive. The fourth appraisal, (d) a close loving caregiver–care receiver relationship, was positively correlated with general well-being, but was not related to burden. The fifth appraisal, (e) dealing with a heavy workload in providing care, was linked with poor affect, but neither symptoms nor burden. Finally, (f) caring at a distance was related to burden, but not to the general outcome measures. These findings suggest that the foci of research questions might be usefully located within an appraisal framework, and that this framework might then provide guidance for the choice of appropriate outcome variables. In many cases, however, a deeper understanding ensues from assessing both contextual and general well-being.

Key Words: Burden • Resiliency • Well-being




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
DementiaHome page
T. Ryan, M. Nolan, D. Reid, and P. Enderby
Using the Senses Framework to achieve relationship-centred dementia care services: A case example
Dementia, February 1, 2008; 7(1): 71 - 93.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social ScienceHome page
Y. Sugihara, H. Sugisawa, Y. Nakatani, and G. W. Hougham
Longitudinal Changes in the Well-Being of Japanese Caregivers: Variations Across Kin Relationships
J. Gerontol. B. Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci., July 1, 2004; 59(4): P177 - P184.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social ScienceHome page
M. Thornton and S. S. Travis
Analysis of the Reliability of the Modified Caregiver Strain Index
J. Gerontol. B. Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci., March 1, 2003; 58(2): S127 - 132.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
AM J ALZHEIMERS DIS OTHER DEMENHome page
A. A. Clair
The effects of music therapy on engagement in family caregiver and care receiver couples with dementia
American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and Other Dementias, September 1, 2002; 17(5): 286 - 290.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
DementiaHome page
M. Nolan, T. Ryan, P. Enderby, and D. Reid
Towards a More Inclusive Vision of Dementia Care Practice and Research
Dementia, June 1, 2002; 1(2): 193 - 211.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
DementiaHome page
M. Nolan, P. Ingram, and R. Watson
Working with Family Carers of People with Dementia: 'Negotiated' coping as an essential outcome
Dementia, February 1, 2002; 1(1): 75 - 93.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2000 by The Gerontological Society of America.