Home
HOME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
The Gerontologist 41:525-538 (2001)
© 2001 The Gerontological Society of America

Randomized Clinical Trial of a Quality Improvement Intervention in Nursing Homes

Marilyn J. Rantz, PhD, RN, FAANa, Lori Popejoy, MSN, RN, CS, GCNSa, Gregory F. Petroski, MSb, Richard W. Madsen, PhDc, David R. Mehr, MDb, Mary Zwygart-Stauffacher, PhD, RN, CS, GNP/GNCSd, Lanis L. Hicks, PhDb, Victoria Grando, PhD, RNa, Deidre D. Wipke-Tevis, PhD, RNC, CVNa, Jane Bostick, MSN, RNa, Rose Porter, PhD, RNa, Vicki S. Conn, PhD, RNa and Meridean Maas, PhD, RN, FAANe

a Sinclair School of Nursing, University of Missouri–Columbia
b School of Medicine, University of Missouri–Columbia
c College of Arts and Science, University of Missouri–Columbia
d School of Nursing, University of Wisconsin–Eau Claire
e College of Nursing, University of Iowa, Iowa City

Correspondence: Marilyn J. Rantz, PhD, RN, FAAN, S422 Nursing School Building, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211. E-mail: RantzM{at}health.missouri.edu.

Decision Editor: Eleanor S. McConnell, RN, PhD

Purpose: The purpose of the study was to determine if simply providing nursing facilities with comparative quality performance information and education about quality improvement would improve clinical practices and subsequently improve resident outcomes, or if a stronger inter-vention, expert clinical consultation with nursing facility staff, is needed. Design and Methods: Nursing facilities (n = 113) were randomly assigned to one of three groups: workshop and feedback reports only, workshop and feedback reports with clinical consultation, and control. Minimum Data Set (MDS) Quality Indicator (QI) feedback reports were prepared and sent quarterly to each facility in intervention groups for a year. Clinical consultation by a gerontological clinical nurse specialist (GCNS) was offered to those in the second group. Results: With the exception of MDS QI 27 (little or no activity), no significant differences in resident assessment measures were detected between the groups of facilities. However, outcomes of residents in nursing homes that actually took advantage of the clinical consultation of the GCNS demonstrated trends in improvements in QIs measuring falls, behavioral symptoms, little or no activity, and pressure ulcers (overall and for low-risk residents). Implications: Simply providing comparative performance feedback is not enough to improve resident outcomes. It appears that only those nursing homes that sought the additional intensive support of the GCNS were able to effect enough change in clinical practice to improve resident outcomes significantly.

Key Words: MDS data • Nursing homes • Outcomes




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J Qual Health CareHome page
B. O. Kjos, G. Botten, and T. I. Romoren
Quality improvement in a publicly provided long-term care system: the case of Norway
Int. J. Qual. Health Care, December 1, 2008; 20(6): 433 - 438.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
E. A. Miller and V. Mor
Balancing Regulatory Controls and Incentives: Toward Smarter and More Transparent Oversight in Long-Term Care
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 2008; 33(2): 249 - 279.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
GerontologistHome page
G. Arling, R. L. Kane, T. Lewis, and C. Mueller
Future Development of Nursing Home Quality Indicators
Gerontologist, April 1, 2005; 45(2): 147 - 156.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GerontologistHome page
J. A. Lucas, T. Avi-Itzhak, J. P. Robinson, C. G. Morris, M. J. Koren, and S. C. Reinhard
Continuous Quality Improvement as an Innovation: Which Nursing Facilities Adopt It?
Gerontologist, February 1, 2005; 45(1): 68 - 77.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GerontologistHome page
K. R. Jones, R. Fink, G. Pepper, E. Hutt, C. P. Vojir, J. Scott, L. Clark, and K. Mellis
Improving Nursing Home Staff Knowledge and Attitudes About Pain
Gerontologist, August 1, 2004; 44(4): 469 - 478.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GerontologistHome page
M. J. Rantz, L. Hicks, V. Grando, G. F. Petroski, R. W. Madsen, D. R. Mehr, V. Conn, M. Zwygart-Staffacher, J. Scott, M. Flesner, et al.
Nursing Home Quality, Cost, Staffing, and Staff Mix
Gerontologist, February 1, 2004; 44(1): 24 - 38.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical SciencesHome page
M. J. Rantz, L. Hicks, G. F. Petroski, R. W. Madsen, D. R. Mehr, V. Conn, M. Zwygart-Staffacher, and M. Maas
Stability and Sensitivity of Nursing Home Quality Indicators
J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., January 1, 2004; 59(1): M79 - 82.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GerontologistHome page
T. J. Lowe, J. A. Lucas, N. G. Castle, J. P. Robinson, and S. Crystal
Consumer Satisfaction in Long-Term Care: State Initiatives in Nursing Homes and Assisted Living Facilities
Gerontologist, December 1, 2003; 43(6): 883 - 896.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GerontologistHome page
M. J. Rantz, A. Vogelsmeier, P. Manion, D. Minner, B. Markway, V. Conn, M. A. Aud, and D. R. Mehr
Statewide Strategy to Improve Quality of Care in Nursing Facilities
Gerontologist, April 1, 2003; 43(2): 248 - 258.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by The Gerontological Society of America.