Home
HOME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
The Gerontologist 41:597-604 (2001)
© 2001 The Gerontological Society of America

State Medicaid Nursing Home Reimbursement Rates

Adjusting for Ancillaries

James Swan, PhDa, Valli Bhagavatula, MBBSa, Amit Algotar, MBBSa, Mouhammad Seirawan, MBBSa, Wendy Clemeña, BSb and Charlene Harrington, PhDc

a Department of Public Health Sciences, Wichita State University, Kansas
b University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
c Social & Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco

Correspondence: James Swan, PhD, Department of Public Health Sciences, Box 152, Wichita State University, 1845 N. Fairmount, Wichita, KS 67260-0152. E-mail: swan{at}chp.twsu.edu.

Decision Editor: Laurence G. Branch, PhD

Purpose: State variation in inclusion of ancillary services in daily Medicaid nursing home reimbursement rates, versus covering ancillary costs outside of such rates, makes rate comparisons difficult. The purpose of this study is to adjust for inclusion of ancillaries when comparing Medicaid rates across states. Design and Methods: Data for 1987–1998 were drawn from a national survey of Medicaid reimbursement. Employing a random-effects model, the PANEL option in the LIMDEP software was used to estimate effects on state average Medicaid nursing facility constant-dollar rates of the inclusion in those rates of a set of ancillaries: physical therapy, occupational therapy, prescription drugs, nonprescription drugs, durable medical equipment (DME), medical supplies, and physician services. Results: Rates averaged higher when they included occupational therapy, physician services, nonprescription drugs, and both DME and medical supplies. Adjusting for the inclusion of ancillaries leads to a much different ranking of states than for unadjusted rates. Implications: Public and industry policy makers should consider the inclusion of ancillaries in rates when considering the relative adequacy of rates across states.

Key Words: Medicaid • Nursing facility • Ancillary services




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Research on AgingHome page
M. Kitchener, J. H. Swan, and C. Harrington
Medicaid Nursing Facility Utilization
Research on Aging, July 1, 2006; 28(4): 493 - 514.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
J. M. Teno, V. Mor, D. DeSilva, G. Kabumoto, J. Roy, and T. Wetle
Use of Feeding Tubes in Nursing Home Residents With Severe Cognitive Impairment
JAMA, June 26, 2002; 287(24): 3211 - 3212.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2001 by The Gerontological Society of America.