Home
HOME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Download to citation manager
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
The Gerontologist 42:4-16 (2002)
© 2002 The Gerontological Society of America

Hydra Revisited

Substituting Formal for Self- and Informal In-Home Care Among Older Adults With Disabilities

Margaret J. Penning, PhDa

a Department of Sociology and Centre on Aging, University of Victoria, British Columbia, Canada

Correspondence: Margaret J. Penning, PhD, Centre on Aging, P.O. Box 1700, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada V8W 2Y2. E-mail: mpenning{at}uvic.ca.

Decision Editor: Laurence G. Branch, PhD

Purpose: In response to concerns among policymakers and others that increases in the availability of publicly funded formal services will lead to reductions in self- and informal care, this study examines the relationship between the extent of formal in-home care received and levels of self- and informal care. Design and Methods: Two-stage least squares regression analyses were conducted, using data drawn from interviews conducted with a sample of 661 older users and nonusers of publicly subsidized home care services. Results: No evidence was found to indicate that more extensive use of formal services is associated with less extensive self- or informal care. This is true among those receiving publicly subsidized services as well as those required to pay part or all of the cost of the in-home services they receive. Implications: The findings provide little support for the substitution hypothesis that an increase in the use of formal in-home services will tend to erode levels of informal or self-care.

Key Words: Substitution • Self-care • Informal care • Home care







HOME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by The Gerontological Society of America.