Home
HOME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
The Gerontologist 42:727-733 (2002)
© 2002 The Gerontological Society of America


SUCCESSFUL AGING

Successful Aging and Well-Being

Self-Rated Compared With Rowe and Kahn

William J. Strawbridge, PhDa, Margaret I. Wallhagen, PhD, RN, CSb and Richard D. Cohen, MAa

a Human Population Laboratory (Public Health Institute), Berkeley, CA
b Department of Physiology, School of Nursing, University of California at San Francisco, CA

Correspondence: William J. Strawbridge, PhD, Human Population Laboratory, 2151 Berkeley Way (Annex 2), Berkeley, CA 94704-1011.

Decision Editor: Laurence G. Branch, PhD

Purpose: This research evaluates the utility of two different definitions of successful aging in predicting well-being. Design and Methods: We assessed the definitions of (a) self-rating and (b) Rowe and Kahn's criteria of absence of disease, disability, and risk factors; maintaining physical and mental functioning; and active engagement with life. We made associations with well-being for each definition using data from 867 Alameda County Study participants aged 65–99 years. Results: The percentage of those rating themselves as aging successfully was 50.3% compared with 18.8% classified according to Rowe and Kahn's criteria. Although absence of chronic conditions and maintaining functioning were positively associated with successful aging for both definitions, many participants with chronic conditions and with functional difficulties still rated themselves as aging successfully; none were so classified according to Rowe and Kahn's criteria. On 14 of 15 measures, self-rated successful aging resulted in sharper contrasts for well-being. Implications: Understanding criteria used by older persons to assess their own successful aging should enhance the conceptualization and measurement of this elusive concept.

Key Words: Impairment • Chronic conditions • Age differences • Quality of life




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LIFESTYLE MEDICINEHome page
N. C. Franklin and C. A. Tate
Lifestyle and Successful Aging: An Overview
American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine, January 1, 2009; 3(1): 6 - 11.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
West J Nurs ResHome page
G. Low, A. E. Molzahn, and M. Kalfoss
Quality of Life of Older Adults in Canada and Norway: Examining the Iowa Model
West J Nurs Res, June 1, 2008; 30(4): 458 - 476.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Age AgeingHome page
A. Bowling and S. Iliffe
Which model of successful ageing should be used? Baseline findings from a British longitudinal survey of ageing
Age Ageing, November 1, 2006; 35(6): 607 - 614.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
BMJHome page
A. Bowling and P. Dieppe
What is successful ageing and who should define it?
BMJ, December 24, 2005; 331(7531): 1548 - 1551.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Public HealthHome page
S. M. Albert, A. I. Love, and V. Raveis
ALBERT ET AL. RESPOND
Am J Public Health, May 1, 2003; 93(5): 701 - 702.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GerontologistHome page
R. L. Kahn
Guest Editorial: On "Successful Aging and Well-Being: Self-Rated Compared With Rowe and Kahn"
Gerontologist, December 1, 2002; 42(6): 725 - 726.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by The Gerontological Society of America.