| HOME | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SUCCESSFUL AGING |
a Human Population Laboratory (Public Health Institute), Berkeley, CA
b Department of Physiology, School of Nursing, University of California at San Francisco, CA
Correspondence: William J. Strawbridge, PhD, Human Population Laboratory, 2151 Berkeley Way (Annex 2), Berkeley, CA 94704-1011.
Decision Editor: Laurence G. Branch, PhD
Purpose: This research evaluates the utility of two different definitions of successful aging in predicting well-being. Design and Methods: We assessed the definitions of (a) self-rating and (b) Rowe and Kahn's criteria of absence of disease, disability, and risk factors; maintaining physical and mental functioning; and active engagement with life. We made associations with well-being for each definition using data from 867 Alameda County Study participants aged 6599 years. Results: The percentage of those rating themselves as aging successfully was 50.3% compared with 18.8% classified according to Rowe and Kahn's criteria. Although absence of chronic conditions and maintaining functioning were positively associated with successful aging for both definitions, many participants with chronic conditions and with functional difficulties still rated themselves as aging successfully; none were so classified according to Rowe and Kahn's criteria. On 14 of 15 measures, self-rated successful aging resulted in sharper contrasts for well-being. Implications: Understanding criteria used by older persons to assess their own successful aging should enhance the conceptualization and measurement of this elusive concept.
Key Words: Impairment Chronic conditions Age differences Quality of life
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. C. Franklin and C. A. Tate Lifestyle and Successful Aging: An Overview American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine, January 1, 2009; 3(1): 6 - 11. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G. Low, A. E. Molzahn, and M. Kalfoss Quality of Life of Older Adults in Canada and Norway: Examining the Iowa Model West J Nurs Res, June 1, 2008; 30(4): 458 - 476. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Bowling and S. Iliffe Which model of successful ageing should be used? Baseline findings from a British longitudinal survey of ageing Age Ageing, November 1, 2006; 35(6): 607 - 614. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Bowling and P. Dieppe What is successful ageing and who should define it? BMJ, December 24, 2005; 331(7531): 1548 - 1551. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. M. Albert, A. I. Love, and V. Raveis ALBERT ET AL. RESPOND Am J Public Health, May 1, 2003; 93(5): 701 - 702. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. L. Kahn Guest Editorial: On "Successful Aging and Well-Being: Self-Rated Compared With Rowe and Kahn" Gerontologist, December 1, 2002; 42(6): 725 - 726. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|---|