| HOME | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Correspondence: Address correspondence to Hal Kendig, MP1, PhD, Professor and Dean, University of Sydney, Faculty of Health Sciences, Sydney, Australia. E-mail: H.Kendig{at}fhs.usyd.edu.au
This article considers developments and directions for environmental gerontology drawing on the three papers in this Forum. The multidisciplinary field came of age during the 1960s with Powell Lawton's powerful environmental press paradigm and its applications to empirical research and building design. Recent theoretical developments in Europe and America have advanced and integrated concepts in psychology, geography, and related disciplines. Time dimensions and active use of space are essential for understanding aging individuals and microenvironments as well as changing populations and macroenvironments. Research on residential environments by health professions is informing community care that is enhancing the independence and well-being of older people. With its proven responsiveness to social and policy priorities, environmental gerontology is now providing strong conceptual and empirical bases for advancing healthy aging and age-friendly societies.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. C. Smith and G. M. Sylvestre Effects of Neighborhood and Individual Change on the Personal Outcomes of Recent Movers to Low-Income Senior Housing Research on Aging, September 1, 2008; 30(5): 592 - 617. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|---|