| HOME | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Correspondence: Address correspondence to Peter H. Ditto, PhD, Department of Psychology and Social Behavior, University of California, Irvine, 3340 Social Ecology II, Irvine, CA 92697-7085. E-mail: phditto{at}uci.edu
Purpose: This study examined patients' and surrogates' attitudes about using advance directives to manage end-of-life medical care. It also explored process preferences, or how patients want decisions to be made. Design and Methods: Data come from the third wave of the Advance Directives, Values Assessment, and Communication Enhancement project, a longitudinal study designed to investigate psychological assumptions underlying the use of advance directives. Three-hundred thirty-seven outpatients aged 65 and older and their designated surrogate decision makers completed interviews and questionnaires. Results: Very few individuals wished to document specific medical treatment preferences and mandate that they be followed, without exception, near death. Most desired to express more general preferences, such as values and goals for care, in addition to (or, instead of) specific treatment preferences and to allow surrogate decision makers leeway in decision making. Patient-to-patient variability with regard to process preferences was substantial, as was surrogates' misunderstanding of the patients' process preferences. Implications: Very few individuals may desire the standard approach to advance care planning whereby preferences for specific life-sustaining treatments are documented and these requests are strictly followed near death. Instead, patient autonomy may be better served by emphasizing discussion of process preferences and leeway in decision making.
Key Words: Advance medical directives • Surrogate decision makers • Medical treatment preferences
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  B. Bergman-Evans, L. Kuhnel, D. McNitt, and S. Myers Uncovering Beliefs and Barriers: Staff Attitudes Related to Advance Directives American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, October 1, 2008; 25(5): 347 - 353. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 E. P. McCarthy, M. J. Pencina, M. Kelly-Hayes, J. C. Evans, E. J. Oberacker, R. B. D'Agostino Sr.,, R. B. Burns, and J. M. Murabito Advance Care Planning and Health Care Preferences of Community-Dwelling Elders: The Framingham Heart Study J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., September 1, 2008; 63(9): 951 - 959. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Workman A communication model for encouraging optimal care at the end of life for hospitalized patients QJM, December 1, 2007; 100(12): 791 - 797. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. E. Volandes, L. S. Lehmann, E. F. Cook, S. Shaykevich, E. D. Abbo, and M. R. Gillick Using Video Images of Dementia in Advance Care Planning Arch Intern Med, April 23, 2007; 167(8): 828 - 833. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. R. Fried, A. L. Byers, W. T. Gallo, P. H. Van Ness, V. R. Towle, J. R. O'Leary, and J. A. Dubin Prospective Study of Health Status Preferences and Changes in Preferences Over Time in Older Adults. Arch Intern Med, April 24, 2006; 166(8): 890 - 895. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Zimmerman, P. D. Sloane, C. S. Williams, P. S. Reed, J. S. Preisser, J. K. Eckert, M. Boustani, and D. Dobbs Dementia Care and Quality of Life in Assisted Living and Nursing Homes Gerontologist, October 1, 2005; 45(suppl_1): 133 - 146. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Minerva BMJ, February 26, 2005; 330(7489): 488 - 488. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|---|
