The Gerontologist
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Waldrop, D. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Waldrop, D. P.
The Gerontologist 46:106-114 (2006)
© 2006 The Gerontological Society of America

At the Eleventh Hour: Psychosocial Dynamics in Short Hospice Stays

Deborah P. Waldrop, MSW, PhD1

Correspondence: Address correspondence to Deborah P. Waldrop, MSW, PhD, Assistant Professor, University at Buffalo School of Social Work, 633 Baldy Hall, Box 601050, Buffalo, NY 14260. E-mail: dwaldrop{at}buffalo.edu

Purpose: This study explored the psychosocial dynamics of short hospice stays (less than 2 weeks) of cancer patients age 65 and older. Design and Methods: In-depth interviews with 59 caregivers of 50 patients were audiotaped, transcribed, and coded by using Atlas ti software. Results: A descriptive typology is presented. A late diagnosis (n = 22 or 44%) was one in which cancer was diagnosed between 2 and 4 weeks before death, rendering earlier hospice admission impossible. Late diagnoses were made because the cancer was missed, masked by comorbidities, or the person resisted seeing a health care provider. A known diagnosis (n = 25 or 50%) was one in which the diagnosis was made long before hospice admission; admission was delayed because the person elected ongoing curative treatment until the final days of life, or the family managed the care without hospice until a turning point (medical, functional, pragmatic, or emotional) occurred, making the care unmanageable. Implications: Hospice utilization is influenced by the interrelationship among patient–family–provider factors. Understanding the characteristics and needs of subgroups of terminally ill people is key to providing good care at life's end.

Key Words: End-of-life care • Cancer • Qualitative research • Hospice • Terminal illness




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Applied GerontologyHome page
N. E. Schoenberg, D. Shenk, and C. S. Kart
Food for Thought: Nourishing the Publication of Qualitative Research
Journal of Applied Gerontology, February 1, 2007; 26(1): 4 - 16.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All GSA journals Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
Copyright © 2006 by The Gerontological Society of America.