| HOME | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Correspondence: Address correspondence to Christine Mueller, PhD, RN, University of Minnesota School of Nursing, 5-160 WDH, 308 Harvard Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455. E-mail: cmueller{at}umn.edu
Purpose: This study reviews staffing standards from the 50 states and the District of Columbia to determine if these standards are related to nursing home staffing levels. Design and Methods: Rules and regulations for states' nursing home staffing standards were obtained for the 50 states and the District of Columbia. Nurse staffing data were obtained from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services On-Line Survey, Certification, and Reporting (known as OSCAR) database. The minimum hours per resident day (HPRD) staffing standards for each state were categorized according to the following: no state-specific HPRD standard (adheres only to federal staffing guidelines); low HPRD standard (
2.5 HPRD); and high HPRD standard (> 2.5 HPRD). A series of hierarchical linear models examined the relationships between state staffing standards and actual facility staffing (total, licensed, and certified nurse aide HPRD), using a number of covariates. Results: The variance in facility staffing was much greater within than between states. Facilities in states with high staffing standards had somewhat higher staffing than states with no standards or low standards, whereas facility staffing in states with low standards was not significantly different from that in states with no standards. Other factors, such as resident acuity and average state Medicaid rate, also were related to staffing. Implications: State staffing standards may not be effective policy tools because they are only one of many factors that affect facility staffing levels. Setting a low minimum HPRD standard may fail to raise staffing, or it may even have a dampening effect on staffing rates in facilities.
Key Words: Staffing levels • Quality of care • Nursing home • State standards • Policy
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  N. G. Castle State Differences and Facility Differences in Nursing Home Staff Turnover Journal of Applied Gerontology, November 1, 2008; 27(5): 609 - 630. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. G. Castle Nursing Home Caregiver Staffing Levels and Quality of Care: A Literature Review Journal of Applied Gerontology, August 1, 2008; 27(4): 375 - 405. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. G. Castle and J. Engberg Further Examination of the Influence of Caregiver Staffing Levels on Nursing Home Quality Gerontologist, August 1, 2008; 48(4): 464 - 476. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. G. Castle, J. Engberg, and Aiju Men Nurse Aide Agency Staffing and Quality of Care in Nursing Homes Med Care Res Rev, April 1, 2008; 65(2): 232 - 252. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
B. A. Kash, N. G. Castle, G. S. Naufal, and C. Hawes Effect of staff turnover on staffing: a closer look at registered nurses, licensed vocational nurses, and certified nursing assistants. Gerontologist, October 1, 2006; 46(5): 609 - 619. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|---|
