| HOME | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Correspondence: Address correspondence to Jung Kwak, PhD, Center on Age and Community/Applied Gerontology, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Enderis Hall 1055, P.O. Box 786, Milwaukee, WI 53201. E-mail: kwak{at}uwm.edu
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Key Words: End of life Race Place of death
Hospice is a program specifically designed to provide end-of-life care in community, long-term, and acute care settings. For residents in nursing facilities offering hospice care—about 76% of nursing homes in the United States and 96% in Florida (Miller & Mor, 2004)—a hospice team takes full responsibility of coordination and management of the patient's medical and psychosocial care while the facility provides personal care services (Miller & Mor, 2004). Past research has suggested that nursing home residents accrue many benefits under hospice care, including less time spent in hospitals (Gozalo & Miller, in press; Miller, Gozalo, & Mor, 2001) and better pain management (Miller, Mor, Wu, Gozalo, & Lapane, 2002). Among Medicare and general patient populations, patients and families have reported higher satisfaction with care (Kane, Wales, Berstein, Leibowitz, & Kaplan, 1984; Teno et al., 2004), and patients are more likely to die in place (Hogan et al., 2000; Teno et al., 2004), under hospice care.
Despite many benefits and the availability of hospice coverage through Medicare and Medicaid (the primary sources of coverage for hospice benefits), underutilization of hospice services has been of concern ever since the Medicare hospice benefit was first created in 1982. Over time it has become clear that this underutilization is particularly pronounced among nursing home residents and minority older adults (Gordon, 1995; Hoffmann & Tarzian, 2005; MedPAC, 2004). In addition, Black residents are more likely to be hospitalized at the end of life than their White counterparts (Mor, Papandonatos, & Miller, 2005), although hospitalization at the very end of life is costly and can lead to painful and debilitating procedures that do not extend life (Engle, 1998; Mezey et al., 2002).
The literature, however, suggests that Blacks are more likely to prefer aggressive treatments and, thus, less likely to use hospice and more likely to die in hospitals. The reasons underlying this preference are many and draw from Blacks' lower socioeconomic status and resources; historical experiences of receiving inadequate and disrespectful treatment by the medical and health care community; and spiritual, religious, and cultural values that may conflict with hospice philosophy (i.e., emphasis on palliative rather than curative treatment; Enguidanos, Yip, & Wilber, 2005; Gordon, 1995; Greiner, Perera, & Ahluwalia, 2003; Kwak & Haley, 2005; Reese, Ahern, Nair, Schrock, & Warren-Wheat, 1999). Among nursing home residents with cognitive impairment, national studies have reported evidence that nursing facilities with a higher proportion of non-White residents are less likely to have do-not-hospitalize orders and more likely to use feeding tubes (Mitchell, Teno, Intrator, Feng, & Mor, 2007; Mitchell, Teno, Roy, Kabumoto, & Mor, 2003). One conclusion drawn from these studies is that when Blacks are well represented among residents, their preference for aggressive care may encourage nursing facility staff to facilitate aggressive end-of-life care (Mitchell et al., 2007).
Although a number of studies have examined racial differences at the end of life, little is known about the experiences of dual-eligible (Medicare and Medicaid) nursing home residents, a group that is not only the least studied but potentially the most vulnerable. Most previous studies on racial differences in hospice use and hospitalization have focused on cancer patients and general Medicare nursing home or adult populations (Han, Remsburg, & Iwashyna, 2006; Lackan et al., 2004; Mor et al., 2005; Virnig, Moscovice, Durham, & Casey, 2004). A few exceptions have examined dual-eligible older adults or nursing home residents (Enguidanos et al., 2005; Miller et al., 2004). Yet the estimated 1.25 million dual-eligible nursing home residents are of special interest for policy makers due to their very high utilization of public funds and such risk-related characteristics as poor health, lower income, and an overrepresentation of minorities (MedPAC, 2004; Schneider, 2003).
Given the importance of understanding end-of-life experiences among dual-eligible, minority nursing home residents, the present research investigated the role of race in using hospice and dying in a hospital among Black and White dual-eligible nursing home residents. Focusing on dual-eligible nursing home residents allowed the study to investigate racial differences in end-of-life experiences among people who have a restricted range of financial assets.
A Conceptual Model
Most prior studies on racial differences in hospice use and place of death have been atheoretical, a problem that has been a major limitation of existing end-of-life research (George, 2002). The present study was guided by the behavioral model of health service utilization initially developed by Andersen (1968). Researchers have used this behavioral model extensively to identify access disparities and other barriers to health services utilization across racial and ethnic groups (Aday & Awe, 1997). The behavioral model describes three categories of factors influencing health services utilization: predisposing, enabling, and need (Andersen, 1968, 1995). Predisposing factors describe the general social forces affecting the propensity of individuals to use health services (e.g., age, gender, race). Enabling factors reflect family and economic resources that enable the use of service (e.g., social network, insurance availability, geographic location of residence). Need factors refer to illness level or need for care (e.g., diagnosis) and are often the most immediate cause of health service use. The behavioral model also classifies types of services into discretionary and nondiscretionary categories based on the level of choice on the part of individuals or families.
In addition to direct effects of predisposing, need, and enabling factors, the behavioral model (Andersen, 1968) and other studies on long-term and health care services (Kosloski, Montgomery, & Karner, 1999; Wolinsky & Johnson, 1991) suggest an interactive nature to the relationship between predisposing and need factors. For example, race can moderate the relationship between illness and perceived need for a particular discretionary service (Kosloski & Montgomery, 1994; Kosloski et al., 1999). Previous research has not extensively explored the moderating effect of race on primary illness as a need factor with hospice as a discretionary service. In this study, we conceptualized hospice service as discretionary due to the explicit requirement of Medicare and Medicaid for beneficiaries to make a decision to give up curative treatment options to receive hospice care. Such specific decision to choose between different types of treatments for residents is not mandatory for the decision to hospitalize, and, thus, we considered hospital stay on the last day of life to be nondiscretionary (i.e., less discretionary than hospice service).
Research Questions
There were three major research questions in this study: (a) Does a racial difference exist in hospice use after accounting for other predisposing, need, and enabling factors? (b) Does race moderate the relationship between cause of death and hospice use? and (c) Does a racial difference exist in dying in a hospital after controlling for other factors and hospice use?
For the first question, we hypothesized that Black residents would be less likely to use hospice even after we controlled for other factors. Based on findings from previous studies, other predisposing, enabling, and need factors included as covariates were age, gender, education, marital status, urban/rural residence, short-term/long-term nursing home status, and diagnosis of cancer of any type (Gozalo & Miller, in press; Greiner et al., 2003; Teno, Weitzen, Fennell, & Mor, 2001; Virnig et al., 2004).
The second research question examined whether Black residents would perceive the need for hospice differently than White residents due to different cultural norms and expectations regarding end-of-life care. We expected that race as a proxy for culture would moderate the impact of the main cause of death on hospice use. We based this hypothesis on consistent findings that Blacks prefer more aggressive end-of-life care and treatment compared with Whites (Kwak & Haley, 2005) and the requirement of Medicare and Medicaid for beneficiaries to choose between curative and hospice care options.
For the third question, we hypothesized that Black residents would be more likely to die in a hospital than White residents after other predisposing, enabling, and need factors were controlled (Pritchard et al., 1998; Weitzen, Teno, Fennell, & Mor, 2003). We also expected that the main effect of race on predicting in-hospital death would be attenuated after the hospice enrollment effect was accounted for, as studies have shown that hospice reduces hospitalization at the end of life (Enguidanos et al., 2005; Gozalo & Miller, in press).
| Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Study Sample
We defined the study sample as dual-eligible nursing home residents aged 65 and older who died during one of three state fiscal years (2000, 2001, and 2002) in Florida. To be included, individuals needed to be (a) dually eligible for nine consecutive months during the last 12 months of life, (b) aged 65 and older, (c) either non-Hispanic Black or non-Hispanic White, (d) either short-term or long-term nursing home residents, and (e) without cause of death recorded as traumatic or sudden (these individuals would not have been eligible for hospice services).
From the initial study sample of 118,703 Medicaid beneficiaries aged 18 and older who died between state fiscal years 2000 and 2002, we deleted 1,036 decedents with manner of death recorded as traumatic or sudden. Of the remaining 117,667 Medicaid decedents, 67,562 (57%) were dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid for at least 9 months; of these, 34,081 decedents were aged 65 and older and either long-term or short-term nursing home residents. Additionally, we deleted a further 3,316 nursing home residents who were neither non-Hispanic Black nor non-Hispanic White, yielding a final sample of 30,765. We decided to focus only on racial differences between non-Hispanic Black and non-Hispanic White residents because of tremendous variations in the reliability and validity of ethnic variables across administrative data systems (Arispe, Homes, & Moy, 2005). Chen, Chen, and Mehra (2005), for example, found that although the identification of Whites and Blacks in a statewide Florida Medicaid data set was more than 90% accurate, accuracy was substantially lower for other groups.
Dependent Variables
The dependent variables included hospice use and in-hospital death. For hospice use as a dependent variable, we considered any use of hospice during the last year of life recorded in the Medicaid Program Analysis data file as use of hospice (hospice = 1, no hospice use = 0). We determined in-hospital death by place-of-death information recorded in the death certificate record (places of death included hospital inpatient, emergency room, outpatient medical facilities, dead on arrival; nursing home; private residence; and others). We recoded this variable into three discrete variables: death at hospital (yes = 1, no = 0), death at nursing home (yes = 1, no = 0), and death at other place (yes = 1, no = 0). We then categorized these into the final variable: in-hospital death (yes = 1, no = 0).
Independent Variables
All independent variables were available from the Medicaid Long-Term Care Analysis file except for education and Hispanic ethnicity, which were available from the death certificate record. We used the Hispanic ethnicity variable to identify Black and White nursing home residents who were not of Hispanic ethnicity.
Predisposing Factors
Age and education were continuous variables measured in years. Categorical variables included gender (female = 1 and male = 0) and race (non-Hispanic Black = 1, non-Hispanic White = 0).
Enabling Factors
We categorized marital status into two groups: married (coded as 1) and nonmarried (coded as 0). We reviewed zip codes based on the Rural–Urban Commuting Areas code developed for the State of Florida and recoded them into two categories: urban (1) and rural (0).
To be considered a long-term nursing home resident, the decedent had to have a documented record of nursing home stay during the last three or more consecutive months of life. If a recipient had a record of nursing home stay during any of the last three consecutive months of life that was less than three consecutive months, the person was considered a short-term nursing home resident.
Need Factors
We determined the principal diagnosis of cancer or noncancer condition as principal cause of death by examining the reported cause of death on the death certificates. We initially categorized and recoded the principal cause of death variable into eight discrete variables: cancer, heart, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, stroke, renal failure, dementia/Alzheimer's disease, and other. In the multivariate models predicting hospice use and in-hospital death, we recategorized the need variable into four binary variables: cancer, dementia/Alzheimer's disease, heart disease (including congestive heart failure), and other (as a reference category).
Statistical Approach
We conducted descriptive analyses of all predisposing, enabling, and need factor variables and two dependent variables (hospice use and in-hospital death). Descriptive analysis results included means with standard deviations and percentages. We performed Pearson's correlations and point-biserial correlation on all independent and dependent variables for the sample. We found no evidence for multicollinearity among variables except for a very high negative correlation (r = –.91) between in-hospital death and nursing home death. The high negative correlation between nursing home death and in-hospital death was due to the fact that other places of death accounted for only 4% of all deaths.
The choice of multivariate analysis method for research questions was a binomial logistic regression, and we estimated a predictive model separately for each of the two outcome variables. For the predictive model of hospice use, we first entered predisposing, enabling, and need factors (Model 1) followed by interaction terms (Model 2). We tested the interaction between race and need variables by entering two Race x Need interaction terms (Race x Cancer and Race x Dementia/Alzheimer's disease). For the model predicting in-hospital death, we first entered predisposing, enabling, and need factors and then followed with hospice use (Model 2), Using chi-square tests, we compared the –2 log likelihood values of subsequent models to evaluate the model fit.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
|
2 (2, N = 30,765) = 8.05, p <.05. Among residents with noncancer principal cause of death, Black residents (n = 4,147) were less likely (19.3% vs 27.7%) to use hospice than Whites (n = 24,944). However, Black residents with cancer as principal cause of death (n = 347) were as likely as their White counterparts (n = 1,329) to use hospice (45.8% vs 49.7%). To determine how race moderated the way in which cause of death influenced hospice use, we estimated separate hospice use models for each racial group (see Table 3). We report pseudo R2 estimates to enable a better understanding of the relative impact of predictor variables. The separate predictive models showed that gender, education, marital status, and area of residence (Step 1) had a significant impact on using hospice for White residents but not for Black residents. Principal cause of death was more important for Black residents, explaining almost twice as much variance as for White residents (Step 2).
|
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
First, we found that although the overall hospice use rate among nursing home residents was low (28%), Black residents were significantly less likely to use hospice than Whites even after we controlled for other predisposing, enabling, and need factors. This finding is consistent with those of studies among older adults (e.g., Enguidanos et al., 2005). However, the current study examined the multiple factors influencing hospice use and place of death among dual-eligible nursing home residents guided by the behavioral model. This is in contrast to previous studies, which have typically been atheoretical and focused on general older adult populations. Although a recent national study by Han and colleagues (2006) found a reduced gap in hospice use between Black and White patients at a broad terminal patient population level, our findings indicate that substantial differences in hospice use remain in this subgroup of dual-eligible nursing home residents in Florida, a state where 96% of nursing homes have contractual relationships with hospice organizations to offer hospice care to eligible residents.
Previous studies have suggested low socioeconomic status and cultural preferences for aggressive treatments as underlying reasons for underutilization of hospice among Black older adults. However, the fact that Black residents were less likely to use hospice even among dual-eligible nursing home residents (with low income and poorer health) after we controlled for education suggests that the racial differences reported herein are unlikely to be the result of differing socioeconomic status. Although race is only a proxy for culture (Dilworth-Anderson, Williams, & Gibson, 2002), cultural preferences of Black residents in part may contribute to their lower hospice utilization as suggested by previous studies (Enguidanos et al., 2005; Gorden, 1995; Greiner et al., 2003; Reese et al., 1999).
Second, another important finding of this study is the difference in the way predisposing, enabling, and need factors influence hospice use among Black and White residents. We found that it was only among residents who died from principal causes other than cancer that Black residents were less likely to use hospice. In further analyses, we found that whereas gender, education, marital status, and urban residence significantly increased the likelihood of hospice use only among White residents, cause of death had the greater effect in increasing the likelihood among Black residents. Given the large sample size of the study, statistically insignificant associations between hospice and gender, education, marital status, and urban/rural status among Black residents are particularly noteworthy.
Although principal cause of death was the strongest predictor of hospice use among both racial groups, the fact that cause of death had a greater influence on hospice use among Black residents suggests that the two racial groups may perceive the need for hospice differently. Research has consistently reported that Blacks prefer aggressive treatments at the end of life (Kwak & Haley, 2005), and it is possible that this cultural preference exerts greater influence when there is less certainty regarding the trajectory of the given illness. Cancer has a relatively predictable illness trajectory compared to other illnesses, and it is also the most common diagnosis among hospice patients (National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization, 2005). With the relatively predictable progression of cancer and a more advanced knowledge base available to determine its prognosis, accepting a prognosis of terminal cancer and hospice while forgoing curative treatment options may be more acceptable for Black residents with cancer than those with noncancer illnesses.
One implication of these results for future interventions is that it may be particularly important for Black residents and their families to receive specific and detailed information regarding the possible trajectories of the illness and potential courses of treatments to help form a realistic assessment of the illness and the best care approach to meet their needs. A recent randomized controlled study of nursing home residents (Casarett et al., 2005) showed that a simple educational and communication intervention can significantly improve timely and appropriate referral of residents to hospice care, even among racially diverse nursing home residents. Replicating a simple intervention such as that used in the study by Casarett and colleagues, with additional efforts to improve culturally competent communication skills of nursing home and other medical staff, may help end-of-life decision-making processes among nursing home residents, their families, and health care staff.
Furthermore, it appears important for nursing home residents to have access to alternative approaches to end-of-life care that do not require 6-month prognosis or forgoing curative treatment options as required by the Medicare hospice benefit. Studies have shown promising results for disease-based care management programs and "bridge" programs that provide palliative care for patients with serious chronic illnesses without requiring a 6-month terminal prognosis or the giving up of curative treatments (Casarett & Abrahm, 2001; National Coalition for Health Care and the Institute for Healthcare Improvement, 2000). These alternatives may be especially appealing to nursing home residents who are not ready to give up curative treatments or who have uncertain prognosis and may help improve access to palliative care for many minority residents.
Third, this study suggests that Black residents are significantly more likely to die in a hospital despite the powerful effect of hospice in reducing in-hospital death. Indeed, Black residents were still 80% more likely to die in a hospital than White residents even after we adjusted for the effect of hospice use and other variables. Due to the discontinuity of care that often results, it is generally expected that nursing home residents should avoid transfers to acute inpatient facilities and aggressive interventions as long as this is consistent with residents' goals and preferences (Casarett et al., 2005; Zerzan, Stearns, & Hanson, 2000).
Previous studies have identified several factors that influence hospitalization and place of death, including individual preferences, quality of life, hospice, facility characteristics, and regional availability of hospital beds (Mitchell et al., 2007; Mor et al., 2005; Pritchard et al., 1998). Several national studies have indicated that, among nursing home residents, institutional factors influence types of end-of-life treatments received by residents. These factors include the number of nurse practitioners and physician assistants on staff, profit status, and the proportion of racial minority residents in facilities (Mitchell et al., 2003, 2007; Mor et al., 2005). Whereas cultural preferences of Black residents may influence organizational (i.e., nursing home) practice to promote aggressive end-of-life care (Mitchell et al., 2007), institutional factors such as nursing home staffing availability, profit status (Mitchell et al., 2003, 2007), and the overrepresentation of minority residents in poor-quality nursing facilities (Mor, Zinn, Angelelli, Teno, & Miller, 2004) may also create barriers to using hospice and avoiding hospitalization, especially for Black residents.
As many nursing home residents at the end of life have cognitive impairment and may not be able to fully participate in the decision-making process, end-of-life care practice among nursing homes may be particularly important in determining types of end-of-life care received by residents. A national study of nursing home residents by Mor and colleagues (2004) found that minority residents were overrepresented in poor-quality nursing facilities. If a higher proportion of Black residents than White residents in the current study were residents of poor-quality facilities, it is possible that Black residents experienced barriers created by nursing home facilities. Poor-quality nursing homes may not have adequate knowledge of or experience in promoting resident-focused, family-centered end-of-life decision making that facilitates educating about available end-of-life care options and eliciting preferences and participation of residents and families in the process. However, a limitation of the current study is that no data were available on facility characteristics, and thus this study was not able to determine whether nursing home residents received timely, adequate information about hospice and other treatment options and participated in the decision-making process. As a result, the extent to which hospice enrollment and in-hospital death among this dual-eligible resident group were influenced by a personal choice, rather than a result of institutional factors, is unclear. Future prospective studies examining multiple individual, facility, and health care market factors will help unravel the complex process of access to hospice and place of death among racially diverse nursing home resident populations.
The study had several limitations. It utilized secondary data sources, and, thus, the effect of hospice in reducing the risk of in-hospital death may have been in part due to preferences of nursing home residents who selected hospice care: Hospice nursing home residents may have inherently preferred to avoid end-of-life hospitalization. Due to the limited nature of the data available, we were unable to directly assess the potential effects of cultural norms associated with ethnic groups and personal end-of-life preferences. Similarly, we did not examine potential institutional factors affecting hospice use and place of death, including health care market factors, physician factors, and organizational characteristics of hospice providers and nursing homes. Finally, the study sample of this research was drawn from dual-eligible older nursing home residents who had died in one of three state fiscal years in Florida. Findings from this study may not be generalizable to the national population of dual-eligible nursing home residents. Due to unique characteristics of Florida, especially the state's high level of hospice availability for nursing home residents (Miller & Lima, 2004; Miller & Mor, 2004), the rate of hospice use may have been higher and barriers to access to hospice may have been lower among dual-eligible nursing home residents studied in this research compared to dual-eligible residents in other states.
Despite its limitations, this study drew upon a large sample of nursing home residents and was guided by a theoretical framework. Results provide strong evidence for racial differences in hospice use and place of death among dual-eligible nursing home residents. To be most effective, efforts to improve quality of end-of-life care for ethnically/racially diverse nursing home residents should focus on improving access to innovative approaches to providing palliative care and retooling communication about these approaches. Future research testing relationships between individual, cultural, and institutional factors influencing end-of-life decision making and service utilization within theoretical frameworks will help advance researchers' theoretical knowledge and develop culturally competent and effective interventions. These interventions will help reduce disparities among diverse nursing home residents at the end of life.
| Footnotes |
|---|
1 Center on Age and Community/Applied Gerontology, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee. ![]()
2 School of Aging Studies, University of South Florida, Tampa. ![]()
3 Department of Aging and Mental Health, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, University of South Florida, Tampa. ![]()
Decision Editor: William J. McAuley, PhD
Received for publication February 3, 2007. Accepted for publication April 17, 2007.
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|---|