The Gerontologist, Vol 34, Issue 6 736-742, Copyright © 1994 by The Gerontological Society of America

REVIEWS

Testing the boundaries of universality: what's mean? What's not?

ER Kingson
Graduate School of Social Work, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, MA 02167.

This article explores the relationship between recent policy reforms, targeting proposals, and a universal Social Security program. It explores principles that inform Social Security, concluding that treating benefits as taxable income and raising the "normal" retirement age push at the boundaries of universality without violating the fundamental precepts of a social insurance program. Universal eligibility to Social Security is assessed as an essential feature of a public pension program and especially beneficial to low- and moderate- income populations. Introduction of a means test is assessed as potentially undermining political support for the program, the economic well-being of low-income elders, and retirement savings efforts. Greater targeting of benefits and financing is possible within the context of the existing Social Security program. Further targeting in Social Security and improvements in selective programs such as SSI do not contradict and may enhance a public retirement income strategy which is built upon social insurance principles.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. Herd Universalism Without the Targeting: Privatizing the Old-Age Welfare State Gerontologist, June 1, 2005; 45(3): 292 - 298. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. KENNEDY Estimating the Size of the Adult Population Needing Personal Assistance Services: Implications for National Disability Policy Journal of Disability Policy Studies, January 1, 1998; 9(1): 7 - 30. [Abstract] [PDF]