| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|---|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
The Gerontologist, Vol 36, Issue 2 178-188, Copyright © 1996 by The Gerontological Society of America
ARTICLES |
RA Settersten Jr and GO Hagestad
Department of Sociology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106-7124, USA.
Several questions about the degree to which cultural schedules exist for the timing of life transitions, as well as the nature of these schedules, remain unexplored. In this article, we examine age timetables for central family transitions. Do individuals perceive age deadlines for these transitions, and by what ages do they think that men or women should have experienced them? How much consensus exists about these deadlines? Why are they considered important, and what consequences are perceived for men or women who miss them? A key theoretical question with which we are concerned is whether contemporary thinking about these deadlines can be considered "normative." A random sample of 319 adults from the Chicago metropolitan area were interviewed about eleven separate life-course transitions, six of which were from the family sphere. By and large, the majority of respondents perceived deadlines for most of the family transitions discussed. While the deadlines cited were quite variable in range, they were also concentrated within a narrow band of ages. The dimensions underlying individuals' thinking about deadlines were centered primarily on the development of self and personality, or were linked to concerns about the sequencing of roles and experiences over lifetime. However, late timing was generally thought to be acceptable, accompanied by little social tension, and without consequences for the individual's life or the lives of other persons to whom one is intimately connected. While a rough, "normal biography" of family life existed in the minds of our respondents, the deadlines attached to that biography were flexible guidelines for the course of family life, not rigid, normative principles. These findings are discussed in light of recent debates about life-course theory and research.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  K. Salmela-Aro, K. Aunola, and J.-E. Nurmi Personal Goals During Emerging Adulthood: A 10-Year Follow Up Journal of Adolescent Research, November 1, 2007; 22(6): 690 - 715. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. A. Dykstra and G. O. Hagestad Roads Less Taken: Developing a Nuanced View of Older Adults Without Children Journal of Family Issues, October 1, 2007; 28(10): 1275 - 1310. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. O. Hagestad and V. R. A. Call Pathways to Childlessness: A Life Course Perspective Journal of Family Issues, October 1, 2007; 28(10): 1338 - 1361. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Wittenberg and M. A. Collinson Household transitions in rural South Africa, 1996 2003 Scand J Public Health, May 1, 2007; 35(3): 130 - 137. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. E. Barrett Socioeconomic Status and Age Identity: The Role of Dimensions of Health in the Subjective Construction of Age J. Gerontol. B. Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci., March 1, 2003; 58(2): S101 - 109. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. L. MILLS, M. A. WAKEMAN, and C. B. FEA Adult Grandchildren's Perceptions of Emotional Closeness and Consensus With Their Maternal and Paternal Grandparents Journal of Family Issues, May 1, 2001; 22(4): 427 - 455. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|---|
| All GSA journals | Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences | Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences |
