The Gerontologist
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lawrence, B. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lawrence, B. S.

The Gerontologist, Vol 36, Issue 2 209-220, Copyright © 1996 by The Gerontological Society of America

ARTICLES

Organizational age norms: why is it so hard to know one when you see one?

BS Lawrence
Anderson Graduate School of Management, University of California, Los Angeles 90095, USA.

Scholars believe that age norms, defined here as widely shared judgments of the standard or typical ages of individuals holding a role or status within a given context, circumscribe behavior in all human societies. Admonitions such as "act your age" indicate that we expect older people to conduct themselves differently from younger people. Laws codify society's judgments of when people are old enough to vote and purchase alcoholic beverages. Work organizations have informal rules about typical ages for promotion. Yet, despite the centrality of age norms to human interaction, we know very little about them. Age norms seem easy to observe, but they have proved difficult to define and measure. Moreover, although many scholars consider age norms in a societal context, few examine them in other structured settings, such as communities or work organizations. This article explores theoretical and measurement issues that have impeded age norm studies, and presents one approach to their resolution using data from three work organizations.


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Organizational Research MethodsHome page
C. M. Riordan and J. H. Wayne
A Review and Examination of Demographic Similarity Measures Used to Assess Relational Demography Within Groups
Organizational Research Methods, July 1, 2008; 11(3): 562 - 592.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Human RelationsHome page
M. M. Greller and S. B. Richtermeyer
Changes in social support for professional development and retirement preparation as a function of age
Human Relations, September 1, 2006; 59(9): 1213 - 1234.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 J. Gerontol. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci.Home page
D. Dannefer
Cumulative Advantage/Disadvantage and the Life Course: Cross-Fertilizing Age and Social Science Theory
J. Gerontol. B. Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci., November 1, 2003; 58(6): S327 - 337.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Organization ScienceHome page
W. J. Orlikowski and J. Yates
It's About Time: Temporal Structuring in Organizations
Organization Science, November 1, 2002; 13(6): 684 - 700.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Clin Nurs ResHome page
M. Clark and K. Huttlinger
Elder Care among Mexican American Families
Clin Nurs Res, February 1, 1998; 7(1): 64 - 81.
[Abstract] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All GSA journals Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
Copyright © 1996 by The Gerontological Society of America.