|
|
||||||||
The Gerontologist, Vol 36, Issue 6 800-811, Copyright © 1996 by The Gerontological Society of America
ARTICLES |
JM Wiener
Health Policy Center, Urban Institute, Washington, DC 20037, USA.
During 1995 and 1996 Congress debated numerous proposals that would dramatically reduce the rate of growth in Medicaid spending, initiatives that inevitably would affect long-term care for the elderly. There are three broad strategies that states might use to control long-term care spending-bring more private resources into the long-term care system to offset Medicaid's expenditures, reform the delivery system so that care can be provided more cheaply, and reduce Medicaid eligibility, reimbursement, and service coverage. Based on the available research evidence, there is little evidence to suggest that large savings are possible without adversely affecting beneficiaries' eligibility, access to services, and quality of care received.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
C. Harrington, H. Carrillo, V. Wellin, N. Miller, and A. LeBlanc Predicting State Medicaid Home and Community Based Waiver Participants and Expenditures, 1992-1997 Gerontologist, December 1, 2000; 40(6): 673 - 686. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
|
C. L. Himes and E. B. Reidy The Role of Friends in Caregiving Research on Aging, July 1, 2000; 22(4): 315 - 336. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
---|
All GSA journals | Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences | Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences |