|
|
||||||||
The Gerontologist, Vol 37, Issue 3 374-383, Copyright © 1997 by The Gerontological Society of America
ARTICLES |
A Noro and S Aro
National Research and Development Centre for Welfare and Health (STAKES), Health Services Research Unit, Helsinki, Finland. [email protected]
Finland's active deinstitutionalization policy aims to reduce the number of elderly people in long-term residential care and to keep noninstitutionalized elderly people living at home as long as possible. As a contribution to the issue of the appropriateness of long-term institutional care, we compared the health and functional ability of elderly people living at home or in residential care to assess the theoretical possibility of discharging the least dependent elderly from residential homes. Findings from two separate data sets collected in 1992 were compared; one (n = 475) was obtained by computer-assisted telephone interview (elderly at home) and the other (n = 459) by postal survey (elderly in residential care). The direct method was used in age and gender standardization, and logistic regression analysis was applied. Elderly people living at home were found to be in better health and with better functional ability than those in residential care. However, a proportion of home-dwellers needing some help with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) assessed their health as being even worse than those in care, and approximated that of institutionalized elderly judged by the personnel to be able to manage with home-based care. Compared with home-dwellers, those assessed as able to manage in- home care were mostly single and had less education and more restrictions in their Instrumental ADLs and medication. Our results indicate that one third of those assessed as able to manage in-home care could possibly be discharged if adequate servicers and housing were available.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
L. Pekkarinen, T. Sinervo, M.-L. Perala, and M. Elovainio Work Stressors and the Quality of Life in Long-Term Care Units Gerontologist, October 1, 2004; 44(5): 633 - 643. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
---|
All GSA journals | Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences | Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences |