|
|
||||||||
The Gerontologist, Vol 37, Issue 4 518-526, Copyright © 1997 by The Gerontological Society of America
ARTICLES |
SL Reynolds
Department of Gerontology, University of South Florida, Tampa 33620- 8100, USA. [email protected]
This study was conducted on a sample of 589 adult public conservatees in Los Angeles County, California, to determine whether the process used to assign them into conservatorship is age-blind, as California law suggests. Findings indicate that age is not associated with the amount of time spent evaluating adults for conservatorship but that increasing age, rather than need, is associated with assignment into Probate conservatorship. The association of age with Probate conservatorship appears to result from the vagueness of the criteria for Probate conservatorship-unable to manage-resulting in the use of age as a proxy for need in the case of decisionally impaired older adults.
HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
---|
All GSA journals | Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences | Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences |