| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|---|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
The Gerontologist, Vol 37, Issue 6 737-747, Copyright © 1997 by The Gerontological Society of America
ARTICLES |
NG Castle, B Fogel and V Mor
AtlantiCare Health Systems, Egg Harbor Township, NJ 08234, USA. [email protected]
The purposes of this article are (1) to identify resident and facility risk factors for the use of physical restraints since the implementation of the Nursing Home Reform Act (NHRA), and (2) to compare these results with resident and facility risk factors for the use of physical restraints prior to the implementation of the NHRA. Data were collected in 1990 and 1993, and represent residents drawn from 268 facilities in 10 states. In the 1993 cohort activities of daily living (ADL) scores, cognitive performance scale (CPS) scores, age, taking antipsychotic medications, a history of falls, and mobility problems were resident-level variables significantly associated with the use of restraints. Full-time-equivalent (FTE) nurse aides per resident, FTE RNs per resident, average occupancy, Herfindahl index, Alzheimer's special care unit, and Medicaid reimbursement policy were facility-level variables significantly associated with the use of restraints. When the 1990 cohort was compared to the 1993 cohort (pre- and post-NHRA), however, only three risk factors for the use of restraints were significant. We propose that, to date, the NHRA may have been successful in reducing the use of physical restraints, but it appears to have had less impact on the types of residents who are restrained.
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  A. Gruneir, S. C. Miller, O. Intrator, and V. Mor Hospitalization of Nursing Home Residents With Cognitive Impairments: The Influence of Organizational Features and State Policies Gerontologist, August 1, 2007; 47(4): 447 - 456. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C Gastmans and K Milisen Use of physical restraint in nursing homes: clinical-ethical considerations. J. Med. Ethics, March 1, 2006; 32(3): 148 - 152. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. P. Hillmer, W. P. Wodchis, S. S. Gill, G. M. Anderson, and P. A. Rochon Nursing Home Profit Status and Quality of Care: Is There Any Evidence of an Association? Med Care Res Rev, April 1, 2005; 62(2): 139 - 166. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. C. Hendry and D. H. Douglas Promoting Quality of Life for Clients Diagnosed with Dementia Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association, June 1, 2003; 9(3): 96 - 102. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. R. Sirin, N. G. Castle, and M. Smyer Risk Factors for Physical Restraint Use in Nursing Homes: The Impact of the Nursing Home Reform Act Research on Aging, September 1, 2002; 24(5): 513 - 527. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. G. Castle Physical Restraints in Nursing Homes: A Review of the Literature Since the Nursing Home Reform Act of 1987 Med Care Res Rev, June 1, 1998; 55(2): 139 - 170. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|---|
| All GSA journals | Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences | Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences |
