The Gerontologist
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Angelelli, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Myrtle, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Angelelli, J. J.
Right arrow Articles by Myrtle, R.
The Gerontologist 40:646-653 (2000)
© 2000 The Gerontological Society of America

A Comparison of Skilled Nursing Facility Rehabilitation Treatment and Outcomes Under Medicare Managed Care and Medicare Fee-for-Service Reimbursement

Joseph J. Angelelli, PhDa, Kathleen H. Wilber, PhDb and Robert Myrtle, DPAb

a Brown University, Center for Gerontology and Health Care Research, Providence, Rhode Island
b University of Southern California, Andrus Gerontology Center, Los Angeles

Correspondence: Joseph J. Angelelli, PhD, Center for Gerontology and Health Care Research, Box G-H3, Brown University, Providence, RI 20912. E-mail: Joseph_Angelelli{at}brown.edu.

Vernon L. Greene, PhD

Purpose: This article compares the rehabilitation treatment and outcomes of Medicare managed care organization (MCO) and fee-for-service (FFS) patients in skilled nursing facilities (SNFs). Design and Methods: Data on 514 MCO patients and 420 FFS patients treated in four for-profit Southern California-based SNFs between June 1996 and September 1998 were analyzed with bivariate and multivariate regression models. Results: After controlling for time since onset and other sociodemographic and health status characteristics, Medicare MCO patients were found to receive significantly fewer therapy units and have significantly shorter lengths of stay in rehabilitation programs. Implications: The findings may be the result of more global differences in the trajectories of care among MCO and FFS patients treated in SNFs, yet they highlight critical issues related to the spread of Medicare managed care in nursing homes and the dynamic between MCO and FFS reimbursement systems.

Key Words: Health outcomes • Managed care • Postacute care




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GerontologistHome page
J. Y. Yip, K. H. Wilber, and R. C. Myrtle
The Impact of the 1997 Balanced Budget Amendment's Prospective Payment System on Patient Case Mix and Rehabilitation Utilization in Skilled Nursing
Gerontologist, October 1, 2002; 42(5): 653 - 660.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All GSA journals Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
Copyright © 2000 by The Gerontological Society of America.