The Gerontologist
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Curry, L.
Right arrow Articles by Robison, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Curry, L.
Right arrow Articles by Robison, J.
The Gerontologist 41:34-42 (2001)
© 2001 The Gerontological Society of America

Medicaid Estate Planning

Perceptions of Morality and Necessity

Leslie Curry, PhD, MPHa, Cynthia Gruman, PhDa and Julie Robison, PhDa

a Braceland Center for Mental Health and Aging, Institute of Living, Hartford Hospital's Mental Health Network, Hartford, CT, and Department of Medicine, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington

Correspondence: Leslie Curry, PhD, MPH, Director, Braceland Center for Mental Health and Aging, 400 Washington Street, Hartford, CT 06106. E-mail: lcurry{at}harthosp.org.

Laurence G. Branch, PhD

Purpose: Although several studies have examined the magnitude and prevalence of Medicaid estate planning (MEP), little is known about factors that influence individual behaviors in this area. Normative data regarding public perceptions of and motivations for MEP are nonexistent. This study explored views about MEP among community-dwelling older adults and family caregivers. Design and methods: Eighteen focus groups were completed (N = 155), with a stratified homogeneous sample to ensure representation from individuals of varying race/ethnicity, experience with nursing home and home care services, and socioeconomic status. Analyses of transcripts were completed with NUD*IST 4.0 software. Results: Disincentives for MEP included losing control of one's assets, Medicaid stigma, and perceived immorality of MEP. Incentives for MEP included preservation of one's estate and protection of a spouse. Finally, variability in accessibility to and awareness of MEP was described. Implications: This exploratory study identifies motivations for individual behaviors and describes evolving social norms regarding MEP; implications for policy and research are discussed.

Key Words: Long-term care financing • Nursing homes • Social norms




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GerontologistHome page
J. Lee, H. Kim, and S. Tanenbaum
Medicaid and Family Wealth Transfer
Gerontologist, February 1, 2006; 46(1): 6 - 13.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American Behavioral ScientistHome page
E. L. Wegner and S. C. W. Yuan
Legal Welfare Fraud Among Middle-Class Families: Manipulating the Medicaid Program for Long-Term Care
American Behavioral Scientist, July 1, 2004; 47(11): 1406 - 1418.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All GSA journals Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
Copyright © 2001 by The Gerontological Society of America.