The Gerontologist
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Morrow-Howell, N.
Right arrow Articles by Rozario, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Morrow-Howell, N.
Right arrow Articles by Rozario, P.
The Gerontologist 41:723-732 (2001)
© 2001 The Gerontological Society of America

How Much Is Enough? Perspectives of Care Recipients and Professionals on the Sufficiency of In-Home Care

Nancy Morrow-Howell, PhDa, Enola Proctor, PhDa and Philip Rozario, MSWa

a George Warren Brown School of Social Work, Washington University, St. Louis, MO

Correspondence: Nancy Morrow-Howell, PhD, Campus Box 1196, George Warren Brown School of Social Work, Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63130. E-mail: nancymh{at}gwbmail.wustl.edu.

Decision Editor: Laurence G. Branch, PhD

Purpose of the Study: This study sought to increase knowledge about the impact of rater role on the assessment of in-home supportive care. The authors compared the perspectives of care recipients and professionals on one aspect of the broad concept of quality of care in home care—the sufficiency of the amount of care provided by informal and formal caregivers. Design and Method: Sufficiency of home care was assessed through concurrent elderly persons' self-report through telephone interview and nurse clinical report based on in-home interviews with the elder. Care was assessed in terms of the sufficiency of the amount of informal and formal assistance received to meet functional dependency needs. Statistical analyses compared the ratings of elder and professional. Results: Professional ratings of the sufficiency of care were significantly lower than those of the elderly care recipients. From the perspective of both care recipients and professionals, sufficiency of care was significantly related to coresidence of elder and caregiver, and to caregiver health. Implications: Consistent with previous literature, rater role was found to influence the assessment of the sufficiency of in-home care. Researchers and providers should recognize that care recipient and professional ratings are not interchangeable.

Key Words: Quality of home care • Rater role • Measurement of quality of care




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Family NursingHome page
K. B. Tetz, P. G. Archbold, B. J. Stewart, D. Messecar, M. C. Hornbrook, and S. A. Lucas
How Frail Elders Evaluate Their Caregiver's Role Enactment: A Scale to Measure Affection, Skill, and Attentiveness.
Journal of Family Nursing, August 1, 2006; 12(3): 251 - 275.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Gerontol. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci.Home page
M. P. LaPlante, H. S. Kaye, T. Kang, and C. Harrington
Unmet Need for Personal Assistance Services: Estimating the Shortfall in Hours of Help and Adverse Consequences
J. Gerontol. B. Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci., March 1, 2004; 59(2): S98 - 108.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All GSA journals Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
Copyright © 2001 by The Gerontological Society of America.