| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|---|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
a Department of Medicine, Division of Internal Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
b Department of Medicine, Leonard Davis Institute on Health Economics, and Institute on Aging, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
c School of Arts and Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
d Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
e Division of Geriatric Medicine and Institute on Aging, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
Correspondence: Donna Brady Raziano, MD, Fellow, Geriatric Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Ralston-Penn Center, 3615 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104. E-mail: Donna.Raziano{at}uphs.upenn.edu.
Decision Editor: Laurence G. Branch, PhD
Purpose: This study compared the response time, response rate, and cost of two types of survey administration techniques: e-mail/web-based versus conventional postal mail. The main aim of the survey was to collect descriptive information on the existence of Acute Care for Elders units and their characteristics by surveying geriatric division chiefs. Design and Methods: Two randomized cohorts of geriatric division chiefs were formed to receive a survey either by electronic mail (n = 57) or by conventional postal mail (n = 57). If there was no response to the initial mailing, two follow-up mailings were sent to both groups using the original modality; a third follow-up was performed using the alternative modality. For each group, response rate and response time were calculated. The average total cost was computed and compared across two groups. Results: The aggregate response rate was 58% (n = 31) for the e-mail group versus 77% (n = 44) for the postal mail group. The overall average response time was shorter in the e-mail group, 18 days compared with 33 days for the conventional postal mailing group. The cost comparison showed that average cost was $7.70 for the e-mail group, compared to $10.50 per response for the conventional mail group. Implications: It appears that although the web-based technology is gaining popularity and leads to lower cost per response, the conventional postal method of surveying continues to deliver a better response rate among the geriatric medicine division chiefs. The web-based approach holds promise given its lower costs and acceptable response rate combined with the shorter response time.
Key Words: Electronic mail • Mail surveys • Survey techniques
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  T.-H. Shih and Xitao Fan Comparing Response Rates from Web and Mail Surveys: A Meta-Analysis Field Methods, August 1, 2008; 20(3): 249 - 271. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. E.A. Burns MD MSc, M. Duffett BScPharm, M. E. Kho PT MSc, M. O. Meade MD MSc, N. K.J. Adhikari MDCM MSc, T. Sinuff MD PhD, D. J. Cook MD MSc, and for the ACCADEMY Group A guide for the design and conduct of self-administered surveys of clinicians Can. Med. Assoc. J., July 29, 2008; 179(3): 245 - 252. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 P. D. Converse, E. W. Wolfe, Xiaoting Huang, and F. L. Oswald Response Rates for Mixed-Mode Surveys Using Mail and E-mail/Web American Journal of Evaluation, March 1, 2008; 29(1): 99 - 107. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. B. VanGeest, T. P. Johnson, and V. L. Welch Methodologies for Improving Response Rates in Surveys of Physicians: A Systematic Review Eval Health Prof, December 1, 2007; 30(4): 303 - 321. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. Foster Thompson and E. A. Surface Employee Surveys Administered Online: Attitudes Toward the Medium, Nonresponse, and Data Representativeness Organizational Research Methods, April 1, 2007; 10(2): 241 - 261. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Hartford, R. Carey, and J. Mendonca Sampling Bias in an International Internet Survey of Diversion Programs in the Criminal Justice System Eval Health Prof, March 1, 2007; 30(1): 35 - 46. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. L. M. McCoyd and T. S. Kerson Conducting Intensive Interviews Using Email: A Serendipitous Comparative Opportunity Qualitative Social Work, September 1, 2006; 5(3): 389 - 406. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. T. Cole Comparing Mail and Web-Based Survey Distribution Methods: Results of Surveys to Leisure Travel Retailers Journal of Travel Research, May 1, 2005; 43(4): 422 - 430. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 W. D. Pace and E. W. Staton Electronic Data Collection Options for Practice-Based Research Networks Ann. Fam. Med, May 1, 2005; 3(suppl_1): S21 - S29. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Vertinsky and B. Forster Prevalence of Eye Strain Among Radiologists: Influence of Viewing Variables on Symptoms Am. J. Roentgenol., February 1, 2005; 184(2): 681 - 686. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 D. Braithwaite, J. Emery, S. de Lusignan, and S. Sutton Using the Internet to conduct surveys of health professionals: a valid alternative? Fam. Pract., October 1, 2003; 20(5): 545 - 551. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 F O'Leary Is email a reliable means of contacting authors of previously published papers? A study of the Emergency Medicine Journal for 2001 Emerg. Med. J., July 1, 2003; 20(4): 352 - 353. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|---|
| All GSA journals | Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences | Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences |
