|
|
||||||||
a University of California, Los Angeles, School of Medicine and the Los Angeles Jewish Home for the Aging/Borun Center for Gerontological Research, Reseda, CA
b Veterans Administration, Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Center, Sepulveda, CA
Correspondence: Lené Levy-Storms, PhD, MPH, Jewish Home for the Aging, 7150 Tampa Avenue, Reseda, CA 91335. E-mail: llstorms{at}ucla.edu.
Decision Editor: Laurence G. Branch, PhD
Purpose: This paper compares three interview methodologies to assess nursing home (NH) residents' unmet needs with regard to activity of daily living (ADL) care. Design and Methods: The study was a survey of 70 residents across seven ADL care domains. The three types of interview methods included: (a) direct satisfaction questions about ADL care, (b) questions that compared residents' preferences about ADL care frequency or occurrence to perceptions of the ADL care delivered (discrepancy measure), and (c) open-ended questions that asked what residents wanted changed about ADL care. Results:Estimates of the proportion of residents with unmet needs were significantly higher with the discrepancy and open-ended measures as compared to the direct satisfaction measures across most ADL care domains (McNemar's Test; p < .05p < .01). Implications: The analysis of residents' responses to open-ended questions produced the most useful information for individualizing aspects of technical care and assessing the interpersonal quality of care, whereas the discrepancy questions elicited specific information useful for changing the frequency or occurrence of ADL care. Interview methodologies that directly ask residents questions about satisfaction with ADL care are the least useful for designing improvement interventions.
Key Words: Satisfaction Preferences Long-term care Quality of care Qualitative analysis
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
A. N. Rahman and J. F. Schnelle The Nursing Home Culture-Change Movement: Recent Past, Present, and Future Directions for Research Gerontologist, April 1, 2008; 48(2): 142 - 148. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
L. Levy-Storms, J. F. Schnelle, and S. F. Simmons What Do Family Members Notice Following an Intervention to Improve Mobility and Incontinence Care for Nursing Home Residents? An Analysis of Open-Ended Comments Gerontologist, February 1, 2007; 47(1): 14 - 20. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
S. E. Fisher, L. D. Burgio, B. E. Thorn, and J. M. Hardin Obtaining self-report data from cognitively impaired elders: methodological issues and clinical implications for nursing home pain assessment. Gerontologist, February 1, 2006; 46(1): 81 - 88. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
L. Levy-Storms, S. F. Simmons, V. F. Gutierrez, D. Miller-Martinez, K. Hickey, and J. F. Schnelle A Refined Protocol for Coding Nursing Home Residents' Comments During Satisfaction Interviews J. Gerontol. B. Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci., November 1, 2005; 60(6): S326 - S330. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
A. M. Carroll, K. Vetor, S. Holmes, and K. P. Supiano Ask the consumer: An innovative approach to dementia-related adult day service evaluation American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and Other Dementias, September 1, 2005; 20(5): 290 - 294. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
|
S. F. Simmons and J. G. Ouslander Resident and Family Satisfaction With Incontinence and Mobility Care: Sensitivity to Intervention Effects? Gerontologist, June 1, 2005; 45(3): 318 - 326. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
L. Levy-Storms and D. Miller-Martinez Family Caregiver Involvement and Satisfaction With Institutional Care During the 1st Year After Admission Journal of Applied Gerontology, April 1, 2005; 24(2): 160 - 174. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
|
J. F. Schnelle Improving Nursing Home Quality Assessment: Capturing the Voice of Cognitively Impaired Elders J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., March 1, 2003; 58(3): M238 - 239. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
---|
All GSA journals | Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences | Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences |