The Gerontologist
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Newcomer, R.
Right arrow Articles by Kane, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Newcomer, R.
Right arrow Articles by Kane, R.
The Gerontologist 42:843-852 (2002)
© 2002 The Gerontological Society of America


HEALTH CARE

Challenges and Accomplishments of the Second-Generation Social Health Maintenance Organization

Robert Newcomer, PhDa, Charlene Harrington, PhDa and Robert Kane, MDb

a Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco
b University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis

Correspondence: Robert Newcomer, PhD, Department of Social & Behavioral Sciences, University of California, 3333 California Street, Suite 455, San Francisco, CA 94118. E-mail [email protected]

Decision Editor: Laurence G. Branch, PhD

Purpose: This study traces the implementation of the second-generation Social HMO demonstration program within the Health Plan of Nevada among more than 35,000 Las Vegas members. Design and Methods: This case study uses health plan reports, claims data, and administrator and clinician interviews covering the years 1999–2001. Results: Care coordination, geriatric services, communications, and support infrastructure development has been extensive. Implementation has occurred at different rates among staff model and network practice physicians. Hospital days and discharges were fewer among clinic than network participants; physician and emergency room visits were more frequent, as were day care, respite care, and home help. Implications: Integrating medical and social care is difficult. Despite great efforts, it took several years before key benefits could be adequately developed and linkages created. Evaluations that target start-up rather than steady-state operation may not capture these accomplishments. Further, federal government efforts to encourage experimentation and innovation in care for aged and disabled individuals may require programs other than time-limited demonstrations.

Key Words: Managed care • Aged • Medicare • Care management




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Med Care Res RevHome page
D. C. Grabowski
The Cost-Effectiveness of Noninstitutional Long-Term Care Services: Review and Synthesis of the Most Recent Evidence
Med Care Res Rev, February 1, 2006; 63(1): 3 - 28.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Applied GerontologyHome page
E. A. Miller and W. G. Weissert
Managed Care for Medicare-Medicaid Dual Eligibles: Appropriateness, Availability, Payment, and Policy
Journal of Applied Gerontology, December 1, 2004; 23(4): 333 - 348.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All GSA journals Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
Copyright © 2002 by The Gerontological Society of America.