The Gerontologist
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Phipps, E. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Phipps, E. J.
The Gerontologist 42:104-108 (2002)
© 2002 The Gerontological Society of America

What's End of Life Got to Do With It? Research Ethics With Populations at Life's End

Etienne J. Phipps, PhDa

a Einstein Center for Urban Health Policy and Research, Thomas Jefferson University/Jefferson Health System, Philadelphia, PA

Correspondence: Etienne J. Phipps, PhD, Albert Einstein Healthcare Network, Center for Urban Health Policy and Research, One Penn Boulevard, Wister 4442, Philadelphia, PA 19144. E-mail: phippst{at}einstein.edu.

Purpose: This study addressed key concerns that gave rise to the question of whether special guidelines were needed to monitor research at the end of life. Design and Methods: Summary of established ethical and legal guidelines that govern the conduct of research with human subjects, with discussion of issues relevant to populations at life's end. Discussion of whether special guidelines are indicated focuses on four questions concerning: (a) time periods; (b) methods and approaches; (c) informed consent; and (d) obligations of researchers. Results: Although research involving patients at end of life does present important ethical and moral challenges to researchers and should be scrutinized carefully by institutional review boards (IRBs), special guidelines are not required. Implications: Closer examination of the dimensions discussed will enhance the research endeavor and model the qualities for which end-of-life research should become known.

Key Words: Institutional review boards • Ethical guidelines • Vulnerable patients




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Complementary Health Practice ReviewHome page
A.-l. Williams, P. A. Selwyn, R. McCorkle, S. Molde, L. Liberti, and D. L. Katz
Application of Community-Based Participatory Research Methods to a Study of Complementary Medicine Interventions at End of Life
Complementary Health Practice Review, April 1, 2005; 10(2): 91 - 104.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
GerontologistHome page
W. E. Haley
A Commentary--Institutional Review Board Approval and Beyond: Proactive Steps to Improve Ethics and Quality in End-of-Life Research
Gerontologist, October 1, 2002; 42(90003): 109 - 113.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All GSA journals Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
Copyright © 2002 by The Gerontological Society of America.