| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|---|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
a Division of Nursing, Steinhardt School of Education, New York University
b Division of Bioethics, Montefiore Medical Center, The Albert Einstein School of Medicine, Bronx, NY
Correspondence: Mathy Mezey, EdD, RN, FAAN, Director, The John A. Hartford Foundation Institute for Geriatric Nursing, Independence Foundation Professor of Nursing Education, Division of Nursing, Steinhardt School of Education, New York University, 246 Greene Street, New York, NY 10003-6677. E-mail: mm5{at}nyu.edu.
Purpose: The aim of this article was to identify major research needs related to quality of life at the end of life and quality of the dying process for vulnerable older people at home, in assisted living facilities, in skilled nursing facilities, and in prisons. Design and Methods: Review and analysis of the literature was used. Results: The science is generally weak in relationship to what is known about quality of life at the end of life and quality of dying for vulnerable older adults in different settings. Few studies address actively dying patients and the reasons for transfers between home and other settings. Existing studies are primarily anecdotal, descriptive, have small samples, and involve a single setting. Participant decisional capacity is a barrier to conducting research in these settings. Implications: Research recommendations for each setting and across settings are provided. The National Institutes of Health should clarify criteria for enrollment of persons with diminished, fluctuating, and absent decisional capacity in research.
Key Words: End of life • Quality of death • Home care • Assisted living • Skilled nursing facilities • Prisons
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  J. Kwak, W. E. Haley, and D. A. Chiriboga Racial Differences in Hospice Use and In-Hospital Death Among Medicare and Medicaid Dual-Eligible Nursing Home Residents Gerontologist, February 1, 2008; 48(1): 32 - 41. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Cohen, J. Bilsen, S. Fischer, R. Lofmark, M. Norup, A. van der Heide, G. Miccinesi, L. Deliens, and on behalf of the EURELD Consortium End-of-life decision-making in Belgium, Denmark, Sweden and Switzerland: does place of death make a difference? J. Epidemiol. Community Health, December 1, 2007; 61(12): 1062 - 1068. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 K. Brazil, D. Howell, M. Bedard, P. Krueger, and C. Heidebrecht Preferences for place of care and place of death among informal caregivers of the terminally ill Palliative Medicine, September 1, 2005; 19(6): 492 - 499. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 F. A. Bailey, K. L. Burgio, L. L. Woodby, B. R. Williams, D. T. Redden, S. H. Kovac, R. M. Durham, and P. S. Goode Improving Processes of Hospital Care During the Last Hours of Life Arch Intern Med, August 8, 2005; 165(15): 1722 - 1727. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. R. Salmon, J. Kwak, K. D. Acquaviva, K. A. Egan, and K. Brandt Validation of the Caregiving at Life's End questionnaire American Journal of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, May 1, 2005; 22(3): 188 - 194. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. I Stajduhar and B. Davies Variations in and factors influencing family members' decisions for palliative home care Palliative Medicine, January 1, 2005; 19(1): 21 - 32. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. F. Jerant, R. S. Azari, T. S. Nesbitt, and F. J. Meyers The TLC Model of Palliative Care in the Elderly: Preliminary Application in the Assisted Living Setting Ann. Fam. Med, January 1, 2004; 2(1): 54 - 60. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. Lynn A Commentary: Where to Live While Dying Gerontologist, October 1, 2002; 42(90003): 68 - 70. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|---|
| All GSA journals | Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences | Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences |
