The Gerontologist
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schofield, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Mishra, G. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Schofield, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Mishra, G. D.
The Gerontologist 43:110-120 (2003)
© 2003 The Gerontological Society of America

Validity of Self-Report Screening Scale for Elder Abuse: Women's Health Australia Study

Margot J. Schofield, PhD1,2, and Gita D. Mishra, PhD2,3

Correspondence: Address correspondence to Margot J. Schofield, PhD, School of Health, University of New England, Armidale, New South Wales 2351, Australia. E-mail: mschofi2{at}metz.une.edu.au

Purpose: Early identification of elder abuse requires a valid, easily administered screening instrument. This study examined the reliability and validity of the Vulnerability to Abuse Screening Scale (VASS), a 12-item self-report measure with four factors (Vulnerability, Dependence, Dejection, and Coercion). Design and Methods: The sample consisted of 10,421 nationally representative Women's Health Australia study participants, aged 73–78, who completed the Time 2 postal survey in 1999. We tested validity of the VASS factor structure and whether baseline risk status independently predicted Time 2 attrition. Results: Findings confirmed the VASS factor structure and construct validity. Four factors explained 51% of variance, and these factors were internally consistent. The Vulnerability and Coercion factors held the strongest face and construct validity for physical and psychological abuse. The Dependence and Dejection factors were valid and reliable and significantly predicted 3-year attrition after controlling for confounders. Implications: Further work is needed to determine sensitivity and specificity of VASS as a screening instrument for elder abuse. Qualitative research could examine specific experiences and contexts of vulnerable women.

Key Words: Elder abuse • Dependence • Dejection • Psychosocial • Cohort




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Research on AgingHome page
H. Buri, J. M. Daly, A. J. Hartz, and G. J. Jogerst
Factors Associated With Self-Reported Elder Mistreatment in Iowa's Frailest Elders
Research on Aging, September 1, 2006; 28(5): 562 - 581.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All GSA journals Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
Copyright © 2003 by The Gerontological Society of America.