The Gerontologist
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cohen-Mansfield, J.
Right arrow Articles by Lipson, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Cohen-Mansfield, J.
Right arrow Articles by Lipson, S.
The Gerontologist 43:302-308 (2003)
© 2003 The Gerontological Society of America

Differences in Presenting Advance Directives in the Chart, in the Minimum Data Set, and Through the Staffs Perceptions

Jiska Cohen-Mansfield, PhD1,2,, Alexander Libin, PhD1,3 and Steven Lipson, MD1

Correspondence: Address correspondence to Jiska Cohen-Mansfield, Research Institute on Aging, Hebrew Home of Greater Washington, 6121 Montrose Road, Rockville, MD 20852. E-mail: cohen-mansfield{at}hebrew-home.org

Purpose: Decisions concerning end-of-life care depend on information contained in advance directives that are documented in residents' charts in the nursing home. The availability of that information depends on the quality of the chart and on the location of the information in the chart. No research was found that compared directives by the manner in which they are collected and summarized in the chart. The goal of the proposed study was to clarify how advance directives are summarized in the patient's record and to clarify how physicians perceive the same advance directives and formal orders.Design and Methods: The study involved 122 elderly persons who reside in one large (587 beds) nursing home. The authors collected data regarding the advance directives from three sources—Minimum Data Set (MDS), the front cover of the resident's chart, and from inside the chart.Results: The rates of documented advance directives found in this study are higher than those reported in the literature. Agreement rates between sources varied as a function of which sources were compared, as well as on the basis of which directive was examined. More specifically, the authors found higher rates of agreement between the information inside the chart and on the cover of the chart than between the MDS and the other two sources.Implications: The reasons for discrepancies may lie in the different functions and procedures pertaining to these source documents.

Key Words: Endoflife care • Nursing home • Quality of life • and Advance directives




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Research on AgingHome page
J. Cohen-Mansfield and S. Lipson
Which Advance Directive Matters? An Analysis of End-of-Life Decisions Made in Nursing Homes
Research on Aging, January 1, 2008; 30(1): 74 - 92.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 GerontologistHome page
W. J. McAuley, R. J. Buchanan, S. S. Travis, S. Wang, and M. Kim
Recent Trends in Advance Directives at Nursing Home Admission and One Year After Admission.
Gerontologist, June 1, 2006; 46(3): 377 - 381.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All GSA journals Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
Copyright © 2003 by The Gerontological Society of America.