The Gerontologist
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Weissert, W. G.
Right arrow Articles by Kim, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Weissert, W. G.
Right arrow Articles by Kim, J.
The Gerontologist 43:797-805 (2003)
© 2003 The Gerontological Society of America

Case Management: Effects of Improved Risk and Value Information

William G. Weissert, PhD1,, Richard A. Hirth, MA, PhD2, Michael E. Chernew, PhD2, Sadhna Diwan, PhD3 and Jinkyung Kim4

Correspondence: Address correspondence to William G. Weissert, PhD, Professor, Department of Political Science, Florida State University, 234 Bellamy Hall, Tallahassee, FL 32306-2230. E-mail: wweisser{at}fsu.edu

Purpose:The purpose of this study was to determine the impact on resource use of providing case managers with information on the potential for patients to benefit from home care services.Design and Methods:Twenty-four case managers working in the Arizona Long Term Care System (ALTCS) were randomized into treatment and control groups. Members of the treatment group were given patient assessments for 25 ALTCS clients, estimates of the patients' risks for various adverse outcomes, and estimates of the aggregate potential benefit for each patient. Members of the control group were given only patient assessments (as is usual practice) for the same sample of 25 clients. Both groups were asked to independently write nonbinding care plans for each patient. The cost of each case manager's care plans was computed by multiplying standard costs per service times the mix and volume of services prescribed for each patient.Results:Treatment group care plan costs were, on average, lower than control group costs and closely tracked variation in estimated patient risks. Comparison group care plan costs were unrelated to risks.Implications:Information about risk and potential benefit can improve targeting of services to long-term-care clients. A prospective study using such an approach is warranted to see if provision of risk and potential benefit information would produce better clinical and economic outcomes.

Key Words: Case management • Long-term care • Risks • Value • Effectiveness • Randomization




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GerontologistHome page
G. Mitchell II, J. R. Salmon, L. Polivka, and H. Soberon-Ferrer
The relative benefits and cost of medicaid home- and community-based services in Florida.
Gerontologist, August 1, 2006; 46(4): 483 - 494.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Aging HealthHome page
V. L. Greene
Prospective Budgeting for Home Care: Making Titration Work
J Aging Health, August 1, 2005; 17(4): 399 - 424.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
GerontologistHome page
J. A. Capitman
Guest Editorial: Verve not ERVs for Care Planners
Gerontologist, December 1, 2003; 43(6): 806 - 807.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All GSA journals Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
Copyright © 2003 by The Gerontological Society of America.