| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|---|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Correspondence: Address correspondence to Timothy J. Lowe, MSW, LSW, LNHA, Rutgers University, Institute for Health, Health Care Policy, and Aging Research, 30 College Avenue, New Brunswick, NJ 08901-1293. E-mail: Lowe_Timothy{at}Yahoo.com
Purpose: We report the results of a survey of state initiatives that measure resident satisfaction in nursing homes and assisted living facilities, and we describe several model programs for legislators and public administrators contemplating the initiation of their own state programs. Design and Methods: Data on state initiatives and programs were collected during March and April 2000 through a mailed questionnaire and follow-up telephone interviews and were current as of September 2002. Results: Of the 50 states surveyed, 50 responses were received (response rate = 100%); 12 states (24%) reported the use of consumer satisfaction measures, and 7 (Florida, Iowa, Ohio, Oregon, Texas, Vermont, and Wisconsin) reported using resident satisfaction data within their consumer information systems for nursing homes or assisted living facilities. Additionally, 2 states (Iowa and Wisconsin) use resident satisfaction data for facility licensing and recertification. The design of the instruments and collection methods vary in these states, as do the reported response rates, per-resident cost, and the purpose for satisfaction data collection. Implications: State satisfaction efforts are in an early stage of development. Well-produced, easily understandable reports on nursing home and assisted living quality could provide information and guidance for patients and families contemplating the utilization of long-term care services. Dissemination of quality information may also facilitate sustained quality and efficiency improvements in long-term care facilities and thus enhance the quality of care for and quality of life of long-term care residents.
Key Words: State policy • Quality monitoring • Nursing home quality • Long-term care outcomes • Consumer information
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  E. A. Miller and V. Mor Balancing Regulatory Controls and Incentives: Toward Smarter and More Transparent Oversight in Long-Term Care Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 2008; 33(2): 249 - 279. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 J. Hyde, R. Perez, and B. Forester Dementia and Assisted Living Gerontologist, December 1, 2007; 47(suppl_1): 51 - 67. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. Sikorska-Simmons Linking resident satisfaction to staff perceptions of the work environment in assisted living: a multilevel analysis. Gerontologist, October 1, 2006; 46(5): 590 - 598. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. Edelman, M. Guihan, F. B. Bryant, and D. J. Munroe Measuring resident and family member determinants of satisfaction with assisted living. Gerontologist, October 1, 2006; 46(5): 599 - 608. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Arling, R. L. Kane, T. Lewis, and C. Mueller Future Development of Nursing Home Quality Indicators Gerontologist, April 1, 2005; 45(2): 147 - 156. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. G. Castle and T. J. Lowe Report Cards and Nursing Homes Gerontologist, February 1, 2005; 45(1): 48 - 67. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. G. Castle Resident Satisfaction in a Transitional Care Unit Journal of Applied Gerontology, December 1, 2004; 23(4): 411 - 428. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 N. Castle Family satisfaction with nursing facility care Int. J. Qual. Health Care, December 1, 2004; 16(6): 483 - 489. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
N. G. Castle, T. J. Lowe, J. A. Lucas, J. P. Robinson, and S. Crystal Use of Resident Satisfaction Surveys in New Jersey Nursing Homes and Assisted Living Facilities Journal of Applied Gerontology, June 1, 2004; 23(2): 156 - 171. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|---|
| All GSA journals | Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences | Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences |
