The Gerontologist
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Wiener, J. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Wiener, J. M.
The Gerontologist 43:19-27 (2003)
© 2003 The Gerontological Society of America

An Assessment of Strategies for Improving Quality of Care in Nursing Homes

Joshua M. Wiener, PhD2,

Correspondence: Address correspondence to Joshua M. Wiener, PhD, The Urban Institute, 2100 M Street, NW, Washington, DC 20037. E-mail: jwiener{at}ui.urban.org

Purpose: Despite substantial regulatory oversight, quality of care in nursing homes remains problematic. This article assesses strategies for improving quality of care in these facilities. Design and Methods: This article reviews the research literature on eight strategies: strengthening the regulatory process, improving information systems for quality monitoring, strengthening the caregiving workforce, providing consumers with more information, strengthening consumer advocacy, increasing Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement, developing and implementing practice guidelines, and changing the culture of nursing facilities. Results: Although individual approaches vary, several themes emerge. First, several strategies require substantially more resources and will increase costs. Second, the research literature does not provide much guidance as to the effectiveness of these options. Third, several strategies assume a degree of data sophistication on the part of nursing homes that may not exist. Fourth, regulation is likely to continue to be the main strategy of quality assurance. Finally, the political saliency of nursing home quality issues is uneven. Implications: Quality of care in nursing homes is a major issue for which there is no simple solution.

Key Words: Long-term care • Nursing facilities • Regulation • Quality indicators




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
DementiaHome page
P. C. Kontos
Embodied selfhood in Alzheimer's disease: Rethinking person-centred care
Dementia, November 1, 2005; 4(4): 553 - 570.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
GerontologistHome page
V. B. Mitrani, D. J. Feaster, B. E. McCabe, S. J. Czaja, and J. Szapocznik
Adapting the Structural Family Systems Rating to Assess the Patterns of Interaction in Families of Dementia Caregivers
Gerontologist, August 1, 2005; 45(4): 445 - 455.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Med Care Res RevHome page
N. G. Castle
Nursing Home Closures and Quality of Care
Med Care Res Rev, February 1, 2005; 62(1): 111 - 132.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
GerontologistHome page
K. L. Braun, M. Cheang, and D. Shigeta
Increasing Knowledge, Skills, and Empathy Among Direct Care Workers in Elder Care: A Preliminary Study of an Active-Learning Model
Gerontologist, February 1, 2005; 45(1): 118 - 124.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All GSA journals Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
Copyright © 2003 by The Gerontological Society of America.