|
|
||||||||
Correspondence: Address correspondence to Marilyn J. Rantz, PhD, RN, FAAN, Professor, Sinclair School of Nursing and Family and Community Medicine, School of Medicine, University Hospital Professor of Nursing, University of MissouriColumbia, Columbia, MO 65211. E-mail: rantzm{at}missouri.edu
Purpose:The purpose of this study was to describe the processes of care, organizational attributes, cost of care, staffing level, and staff mix in a sample of Missouri homes with good, average, and poor resident outcomes.Design and Methods:A three-group exploratory study design was used, with 92 nursing homes randomly selected from all nursing homes in Missouri and classified into resident outcome groups. Resident outcomes were measured by use of quality indicators derived from nursing home Minimum Data Set resident assessment data. Cost and staffing information were derived from Medicaid cost reports. Participant observation methods were used to describe the care delivery processes.Results:In facilities with good resident outcomes, there are basics of care and processes surrounding each that staff consistently do: helping residents with ambulation, nutrition and hydration, and toileting and bowel regularity; preventing skin breakdown; and managing pain. The analysis revealed necessary organizational attributes that must be in place in order for those basics of care to be accomplished: consistent nursing and administrative leadership, the use of team and group processes, and an active quality improvement program. The only facility characteristic across the outcome groups that was significantly different was the number of licensed beds, with smaller facilities having better outcomes. No significant differences in costs, staffing, or staff mix were detected across the groups. A trend in higher total costs of $13.58 per resident per day was detected in the poor-outcome group compared with the good-outcome group.Implications:For nursing homes to achieve good resident outcomes, they must have leadership that is willing to embrace quality improvement and group process and see that the basics of care delivery are done for residents. Good quality care may not cost more than poor quality care; there is some evidence that good quality care may cost less. Small facilities of 60 beds were more likely to have good resident outcomes. Strategies have to be considered so larger facilities can be organized into smaller clusters of units that could function as small nursing homes within the larger whole.
Key Words: Nursing homes Quality of care Quality indicators Quality measurement Minimum Data Set (MDS) Costs of care Staffing Staff mix Registered nurse staffing
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
N. G. Castle Nursing Home Caregiver Staffing Levels and Quality of Care: A Literature Review Journal of Applied Gerontology, August 1, 2008; 27(4): 375 - 405. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
|
D. L. White, L. Newton-Curtis, and K. S. Lyons Development and Initial Testing of a Measure of Person-Directed Care Gerontologist, July 1, 2008; 48(suppl_1): 114 - 123. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
J. Goodson, W. Jang, and M. Rantz Nursing Home Care Quality: Insights From a Bayesian Network Approach Gerontologist, June 1, 2008; 48(3): 338 - 348. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
M. D. Mezey, E. L. Mitty, and S. G. Burger Rethinking Teaching Nursing Homes: Potential for Improving Long-Term Care Gerontologist, February 1, 2008; 48(1): 8 - 15. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
G. Arling, R. L. Kane, C. Mueller, J. Bershadsky, and H. B. Degenholtz Nursing Effort and Quality of Care for Nursing Home Residents Gerontologist, October 1, 2007; 47(5): 672 - 682. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
B. A. Kash, C. Hawes, and C. D. Phillips Comparing Staffing Levels in the Online Survey Certification and Reporting (OSCAR) System With the Medicaid Cost Report Data: Are Differences Systematic? Gerontologist, August 1, 2007; 47(4): 480 - 489. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
M. J. Rantz, D. R. Mehr, L. Hicks, J. Scott-Cawiezell, G. F. Petroski, R. W. Madsen, R. Porter, and M. Zwygart-Stauffacher Entrepreneurial program of research and service to improve nursing home care. West J Nurs Res, December 1, 2006; 28(8): 918 - 934. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
|
B. A. Kash, N. G. Castle, G. S. Naufal, and C. Hawes Effect of staff turnover on staffing: a closer look at registered nurses, licensed vocational nurses, and certified nursing assistants. Gerontologist, October 1, 2006; 46(5): 609 - 619. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
C. M. Hughes and K. L. Lapane Nurses' and nursing assistants' perceptions of patient safety culture in nursing homes Int. J. Qual. Health Care, August 1, 2006; 18(4): 281 - 286. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
N. Morrow-Howell and L. S. Noelker Raising the Bar to Enhance the Research-Practice Link. Gerontologist, June 1, 2006; 46(3): 315 - 316. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
D. B. Mukamel, H. Temkin-Greener, R. Delavan, D. R. Peterson, D. Gross, S. Kunitz, and T. F. Williams Team Performance and Risk-Adjusted Health Outcomes in the Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE) Gerontologist, April 1, 2006; 46(2): 227 - 237. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
C. Mueller, G. Arling, R. Kane, J. Bershadsky, D. Holland, and A. Joy Nursing Home Staffing Standards: Their Relationship to Nurse Staffing Levels Gerontologist, February 1, 2006; 46(1): 74 - 80. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|
G. Bravo, M.-F. Dubois, and P.-M. Roy Using goal attainment scaling to improve the quality of long-term care: a group-randomized trial Int. J. Qual. Health Care, December 1, 2005; 17(6): 511 - 519. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
---|
All GSA journals | Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences | Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences |