The Gerontologist
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kane, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Kling, K. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kane, R. L.
Right arrow Articles by Kling, K. C.
The Gerontologist 44:624-632 (2004)
© 2004 The Gerontological Society of America

Using Resident Reports of Quality of Life to Distinguish Among Nursing Homes

Robert L. Kane, MD1,, Boris Bershadsky, PhD1, Rosalie A. Kane, PhD1, Howard H. Degenholtz, PhD2, Jiexin (Jason) Liu, PhD3, Katherine Giles, RN, MBA1 and Kristen C. Kling, PhD4

Correspondence: Address correspondence to Robert L. Kane, MD, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, D351 Mayo (MMC 197), 420 Delaware Street SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455. E-mail: kanex001{at}umn.edu

Purpose: We used measures created to assess the quality of life (QOL) of nursing home residents to distinguish among nursing facilities. Design and Methods: We statistically adjusted scores for 10 QOL domains derived from standardized interviews with nursing home residents for age, gender, activities of daily living functioning, cognitive functioning, and length of stay, and then we aggregated them to the facility level. We compared the patterns across a sample of 40 facilities. We correlated facility characteristics with QOL scores. Results: The pattern of QOL scores for each of the 10 domains was generally consistent within a given facility. Although resident characteristics played a major role in explaining variance, there were significant effects of facilities as well. Some modest relationships were found between facility characteristics such as ownership, percentage of private rooms, and rural–urban location and facility QOL scores. No effect of facility size was detected. Implications: This article shows that it is possible to differentiate among facilities on the basis of resident self-reported QOL. On the basis of our analysis, we find that a sample of 28 residents per facility is sufficient to generate a reliable QOL score for each of the domains studied.

Key Words: Quality of life • Nursing homes • Resident reports




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
E. A. Miller and V. Mor
Balancing Regulatory Controls and Incentives: Toward Smarter and More Transparent Oversight in Long-Term Care
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 2008; 33(2): 249 - 279.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Gerontol. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci.Home page
R. L. Kane, R. A. Kane, B. Bershadsky, H. Degenholtz, K. Kling, A. Totten, and K. Jung
Proxy Sources for Information on Nursing Home Residents' Quality of Life
J. Gerontol. B. Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci., November 1, 2005; 60(6): S318 - S325.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All GSA journals Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
Copyright © 2004 by The Gerontological Society of America.