|
|
||||||||
Correspondence: Address correspondence to Eileen J. Porter, PhD, RN, Professor, MU Sinclair School of Nursing, University of MissouriColumbia, Columbia, MO 65211. E-mail: PorterEJ{at}missouri.edu
Purpose: The formalinformal dichotomy of home care, which has been a theoretical framework in quantitative and qualitative research, might not be descriptive of older persons' views about their home-care providers. This qualitative study explores the perspectives of older women about the characteristics of their home-care providers. Design and Methods: Three interviews were conducted with each of 25 women (aged 8094 years) during the first 4 months of participation in a 3-year phenomenological study. The women described their helpers. We differentiated helper types on the basis of the nature of the help, and we explored variations in compensation arrangements. Results: We delineated a new typology of home-care helpers: regular helpers, on-call helpers, can-will doers, and mainstays. Implications: When home-care helpers are categorized by type of assistance provided, the potential value of their efforts is more evident. The association of formal care with paid help and informal care with nonpaid help limits the effectiveness of the dichotomy as a basis for home-care-payment policies. The new home-care-helper typology cuts across the dimensions of the dichotomy, providing an alternative theoretical framework for further research.
Key Words: Home-care-helper typology Formalinformal home care Standby assistance
HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
---|
All GSA journals | Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences | Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences |