The Gerontologist
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by Goldwyn, J. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Johnson, R. W.
Right arrow Articles by Goldwyn, J. H.
The Gerontologist 45:26-35 (2005)
© 2005 The Gerontological Society of America

Who Foregoes Survivor Protection in Employer-Sponsored Pension Annuities?

Richard W. Johnson, PhD1,, Cori E. Uccello, FSA, MPP1 and Joshua H. Goldwyn, BA1

Correspondence: Address correspondence to Richard W. Johnson, Senior Research Associate, The Urban Institute, 2100 M Street, NW, Washington, DC 20037. E-mail: rjohnson{at}ui.urban.org

Purpose: Retirees in traditional pension plans must generally choose between single life annuities, which provide regular payments until death, and joint and survivor annuities, which pay less each month but continue to make payments to the spouse after the death of the retired worker. This article examines the payout decision and measures the share of married retirees with pension annuities who forego survivor protection. Design and Methods: The analysis consists of a probit model of the pension payout decision, based on data from the 1992–2000 waves of the Health and Retirement Study. Results: More than one quarter (28%) of married men and two thirds of married women receiving employer-sponsored retirement annuities declined survivor protection. Men with small pensions and limited household wealth, men in better health than their spouses, and men whose spouses have pension coverage from their own employers are more likely than other men to reject survivor protection. Implications: Most workers appear to make payout decisions by rationally balancing the costs and benefits of each type of annuity, suggesting that existing measures to encourage joint and survivor annuities are adequate. However, the growth in 401(k) plans, which are generally not covered by existing laws protecting spousal pension rights, may leave widows vulnerable.

Key Words: Pensions • Retirement annuities • Survivor protection • Widows • Economic well-being




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Gerontol. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci.Home page
H. van Solinge and K. Henkens
Involuntary Retirement: The Role of Restrictive Circumstances, Timing, and Social Embeddedness
J. Gerontol. B. Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci., September 1, 2007; 62(5): S295 - S303.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Research on AgingHome page
H. van Solinge
Health Change in Retirement: A Longitudinal Study among Older Workers in the Netherlands
Research on Aging, May 1, 2007; 29(3): 225 - 256.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All GSA journals Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
Copyright © 2005 by The Gerontological Society of America.