The Gerontologist
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Whitlatch, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Tucke, S. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Whitlatch, C. J.
Right arrow Articles by Tucke, S. S.
The Gerontologist 45:370-380 (2005)
© 2005 The Gerontological Society of America

Measuring the Values and Preferencesfor Everyday Care of Persons With Cognitive Impairment and Their Family Caregivers

Carol J. Whitlatch, PhD1, Lynn Friss Feinberg, MSW2 and Shandra S. Tucke, MA1

Correspondence: Address correspondence to Carol J. Whitlatch, The Margaret Blenkner Research Institute, Benjamin Rose, 850 Euclid Avenue, Suite 1100, Cleveland, OH 44114. E-mail: cwhitlat{at}benrose.org or stucke{at}benrose.org

Purpose: This study describes the development and psychometric properties of a 24-item scale to be used in both research and practice settings that assesses the everyday care values and preferences of individuals with cognitive impairment and the perceptions of family caregivers about their relative's values and preferences for care. Design and Methods: The Values and Preferences Scale was developed on the basis of previous measures used with cognitively intact samples with additional items generated by the authors in consultation with an advisory committee of practitioners, researchers, family caregivers, and persons with cognitive impairment. Individuals with mild to moderate cognitive impairment and their family caregivers (n = 111) were interviewed for the study. Results: Results of a factor analysis determined that the Values and Preferences Scale can be divided into two domains or subscales for persons with cognitive impairment and their family caregivers (i.e., Environment–Social Network and Personal Autonomy). These domains were found to have good internal consistency for both the individuals and their caregivers (Cronbach's alphas ranged from.70 to.82). Evidence of their psychometric properties compared with measures of depression, quality of life, and involvement in decision making was also found. Implications: These findings suggest that persons with cognitive impairment are able to express values and preferences about care they currently receive or will need in the future. Further application and testing of the Values and Preferences Scale should prove useful to practitioners who assist those with cognitive impairment and their caregivers with daily care decisions and the development of care plans.

Key Words: Dementia • Decision making • Caregiving




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GerontologistHome page
P. Housen, G. R. Shannon, B. Simon, M. O. Edelen, M. P. Cadogan, L. Sohn, M. Jones, J. L. Buchanan, and D. Saliba
What the Resident Meant to Say: Use of Cognitive Interviewing Techniques to Develop Questionnaires for Nursing Home Residents
Gerontologist, April 1, 2008; 48(2): 158 - 169.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GerontologistHome page
M. D. Sebern and C. J. Whitlatch
Dyadic Relationship Scale: A Measure of the Impact of the Provision and Receipt of Family Care
Gerontologist, December 1, 2007; 47(6): 741 - 751.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GerontologistHome page
H. L. Menne and C. J. Whitlatch
Decision-Making Involvement of Individuals With Dementia
Gerontologist, December 1, 2007; 47(6): 810 - 819.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DementiaHome page
N. L. Chappell, R. C. Reid, and J. A. Gish
Staff-based measures of individualized care for persons with dementia in long-term care facilities
Dementia, November 1, 2007; 6(4): 527 - 547.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
DementiaHome page
D. O'Connor, A. Phinney, A. Smith, J. Small, B. Purves, J. Perry, E. Drance, M. Donnelly, H. Chaudhury, and L. Beattie
Personhood in dementia care: Developing a research agenda for broadening the vision
Dementia, February 1, 2007; 6(1): 121 - 142.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
GerontologistHome page
C. J. Whitlatch, K. Judge, S. H. Zarit, and E. Femia
Dyadic intervention for family caregivers and care receivers in early-stage dementia.
Gerontologist, October 1, 2006; 46(5): 688 - 694.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DementiaHome page
M. Downs, S. M.B. Ariss, E. Grant, J. Keady, S. Turner, M. Bryans, J. Wilcock, E. Levin, R. O'carroll, and S. Iliffe
Family carers' accounts of general practice contacts for their relatives with early signs of dementia
Dementia, August 1, 2006; 5(3): 353 - 373.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
DementiaHome page
S. M.B. Ariss, E. Grant, M. Downs, B. Fernandez, R. Gallagher, D. Cherry, and M. Barclay
Piloting a consumer-directed intervention to improve primary care for dementia in the UK
Dementia, August 1, 2006; 5(3): 456 - 462.
[PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All GSA journals Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
Copyright © 2005 by The Gerontological Society of America.