The Gerontologist
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fulmer, T.
Right arrow Articles by Norman, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fulmer, T.
Right arrow Articles by Norman, R.
The Gerontologist 45:525-534 (2005)
© 2005 The Gerontological Society of America

Dyadic Vulnerability and Risk Profiling for Elder Neglect

Terry Fulmer, PhD1, Gregory Paveza, PhD2, Carla VandeWeerd, PhD3, Susan Fairchild, MPH1, Lisa Guadagno, MPH1, Marguarette Bolton-Blatt, BA1 and Robert Norman, PhD4

Correspondence: Address correspondence to Terry Fulmer, Division of Nursing, New York University, 246 Greene Street, New York, NY 10003-6677. E-mail: terryfulmer.don{at}nyu.edu

Purpose: Neglect of older adults accounts for 60% to 70% of all elder-mistreatment reports made to adult protective services. The purpose of this article is to report data from research, using a risk-and-vulnerability model, that captures the independent contributions of both the elder and the caregiver as they relate to the outcome of neglect. Methods: Between February 2001 and September 2003, older adults were screened and recruited through four emergency departments in New York and Tampa. The diagnosis of neglect was made by an expert neglect-assessment team. Elders and their caregivers were then scheduled for separate face-to-face interviews after discharge. Results: Constructs within the risk-and-vulnerability model were examined for scale-score significance based on the outcome diagnosis of neglect. In the risk domain, caregivers' functional status, childhood trauma, and personality were statistically significant. In the vulnerability domain, the elders' cognitive status, functional status, depression, social support, childhood trauma, and personality were significant. Implications: Findings from this study underscore the value of interdisciplinary assessment teams in emergency departments for screening elder neglect, with attention given to risk factors related to the caregiver and elder vulnerability factors, including reports of childhood trauma. The risk-and-vulnerability model may provide a link between the caregiving and neglect research. Data should be collected independently from both members of the elder–caregiver dyad in order for clinicians to understand factors related to elders who receive the diagnosis of neglect from interdisciplinary teams.

Key Words: Elder mistreatment • Assessment • Caregiver burden • Childhood trauma




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J Am Psychiatr Nurses AssocHome page
M. W. Baker
Elder Mistreatment: Risk, Vulnerability, and Early Mortality
Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association, January 1, 2007; 12(6): 313 - 321.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Psychiatr Nurses AssocHome page
S. M. Strasser and T. Fulmer
The Clinical Presentation of Elder Neglect: What We Know and What We Can Do
Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association, January 1, 2007; 12(6): 340 - 349.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All GSA journals Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
Copyright © 2005 by The Gerontological Society of America.