The Gerontologist
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Becker, S.
Right arrow Articles by Burmedi, D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Becker, S.
Right arrow Articles by Burmedi, D.
The Gerontologist 45:739-746 (2005)
© 2005 The Gerontological Society of America

Assistive Device Use in Visually Impaired Older Adults: Role of Control Beliefs

Stefanie Becker, PhD1, Hans-Werner Wahl, PhD2, Oliver Schilling, PhD2 and David Burmedi, PhD2

Correspondence: Address correspondence to Hans-Werner Wahl, PhD, German Center for Research on Ageing at the University of Heidelberg, Bergheimer Str. 20, D-69115 Heidelberg. E-mail: wahl{at}dzfa.uni-heidelberg.de

Purpose: We investigate whether psychological control, conceptually framed within the life-span theory of control by Heckhausen and Schulz, drives assistive device use in visually impaired elders. In particular, we expect the two primary control modes differentiated in the life-span theory of control (i.e., selective primary and compensatory primary control) to be positively related to assistive device use. We present cross-sectional as well as repeated measures analyses. Design and Methods: We assessed a sample of 71 participants (age, M = 79.5 years) suffering from age-related macular degeneration at two measurement occasions covering a 1-year interval. In addition to the application of a standardized control questionnaire based on the life-span theory of control distinctions of different control modes, we measured assistive device use as the reported number of devices used, based on a given list. Results: On the bivariate level, we could find the theoretically expected relation between selective primary control and selective compensatory control only for the analyses at Time 1. We used multiple regression models to acknowledge overlapping variance beneath the different control modes; we did this separately for both measurement occasions. Consistent with our expectation, we found selective primary control to be a significant predictor of assistive device use at Time 1, whereas after a 1-year period of disease progression, compensatory primary control took over at Time 2. Implications: Findings provide empirical support for the assumption that educational programs related to assistive device use in visually impaired elders also should take psychological control issues more strongly into consideration.

Key Words: Age-related low vision • Age-related macular degeneration • Assistive device use • Control theory • Psychological factors







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All GSA journals Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
Copyright © 2005 by The Gerontological Society of America.