The Gerontologist
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Howell-White, S.
Right arrow Articles by Lucas, J. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Howell-White, S.
Right arrow Articles by Lucas, J. A.
The Gerontologist 46:334-343 (2006)
© 2006 The Gerontological Society of America

Creating Needs-Based Tiered Models for Assisted Living Reimbursement

Sandra Howell-White, PhD1, Dorothy Gaboda, PhD1, Nancy Scotto Rosato, MA1 and Judith A. Lucas, EdD2

Correspondence: Address correspondence to Sandra Howell-White, PhD, Rutgers Center for State Health Policy, 317 George Street, Suite 400, New Brunswick, NJ 08901. E-mail: showell{at}ifh.rutgers.edu

Purpose: This research provides state policy makers and others interested in developing needs-based reimbursement models for Medicaid-funded assisted living with an evaluation of different methodologies that affect the structure and outcomes of these models. Design and Methods: We used assessment data from Medicaid-enrolled assisted living residents and waiver-eligible community-dwelling individuals (N = 726) in order to evaluate five methodologies in the design of these tiered needs-based models. We used ordinary least squares regression analyses in order to evaluate each model's ability to predict the time needed to care for individuals with varying needs (e.g., activities of daily living limitations, dementia, special services.) Results: These models varied in fit from.127 to a high of.357 using the adjusted R2 statistic. Both count and weighted models adequately predicted service needs and discriminated individuals into their appropriate tiers well. Weighted models with the largest score range worked best and provided more flexibility. Implications: Policy makers can tailor the generic tiered models developed with these methods to a state's population. Any state considering adoption of a needs-based tiered model will need to refine its model based on its assisted living population characteristics, its resources, and how the model fits its long-term care system. For the industry, these models can serve to identify levels of care needed in planning for staff time and skill mix required for assisted living as well as other long-term care populations.

Key Words: Assisted living • Long-term care • Medicaid waiver • Reimbursement models




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GerontologistHome page
J. Hyde, R. Perez, and B. Forester
Dementia and Assisted Living
Gerontologist, December 1, 2007; 47(suppl_1): 51 - 67.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All GSA journals Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
Copyright © 2006 by The Gerontological Society of America.