The Gerontologist
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Yardley, L.
Right arrow Articles by Holt, A. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Yardley, L.
Right arrow Articles by Holt, A. R.
The Gerontologist 46:650-660 (2006)
© 2006 The Gerontological Society of America

Older People's Views of Falls-Prevention Interventions in Six European Countries

Lucy Yardley, PhD1, Felicity L. Bishop, PhD1, Nina Beyer, PhD2, Klaus Hauer, PhD3, Gertrudis I. J. M. Kempen, PhD4, Chantal Piot-Ziegler, PhD5, Chris J. Todd, PhD6, Thérèse Cuttelod, MSc5, Maria Horne, MA6, Kyriaki Lanta, MSc1 and Anne Rosell Holt, MSc2

Correspondence: Address correspondence to Lucy Yardley, School of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom SO17 1BJ. E-mail: L.Yardley{at}

Purpose: Our study identified factors common to a variety of populations and settings that may promote or inhibit uptake and adherence to falls-related interventions. Design and Methods: Semistructured interviews to assess perceived advantages and barriers to taking part in falls-related interventions were carried out in six European countries with 69 people aged 68 to 97 years. The sample was selected to include people with very different experiences of participation or nonparticipation in falls-related interventions, but all individuals were asked about interventions that included strength and balance training. Results: Attitudes were similar in all countries and contexts. People were motivated to participate in strength and balance training by a wide range of perceived benefits (interest and enjoyment, improved health, mood, and independence) and not just reduction of falling risk. Participation also was encouraged by a personal invitation from a health practitioner and social approval from family and friends. Barriers to participation included denial of falling risk, the belief that no additional falls-prevention measures were necessary, practical barriers to attendance at groups (e.g., transport, effort, and cost), and a dislike of group activities. Implications: Because many older people reject the idea that they are at risk of falling, the uptake of strength and balance training programs may be promoted more effectively by maximizing and emphasizing their multiple positive benefits for health and well-being. A personal invitation from a health professional to participate is important, and it also may be helpful to provide home-based programs for those who dislike or find it difficult to attend groups.

Key Words: Falls • Patient compliance • Prevention • Refusal to participate

All GSA journals Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
Copyright © 2006 by The Gerontological Society of America.