The Gerontologist
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Parker, M. G.
Right arrow Articles by Thorslund, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Parker, M. G.
Right arrow Articles by Thorslund, M.
The Gerontologist 47:150-158 (2007)
© 2007 The Gerontological Society of America

Health Trends in the Elderly Population: Getting Better and Getting Worse

Marti G. Parker, PhD1 and Mats Thorslund, PhD1,2

Correspondence: Address correspondence to Marti G. Parker, Aging Research Center, Karolinska Institute and Stockholm University, Gävlegatan 16, 113 30 Stockholm, Sweden. E-mail: marti.parker{at}ki.se

Health trends in the fastest growing sector of the population, the oldest old, have received much attention during the past decade because of the rising costs of medical and long-term care. Many studies have suggested a compression of morbidity in this sector, implying that the future care needs of elderly people will not follow the demographic prognoses. Most of these studies have used health indicators based on disability, a concept that is contextually embedded. We have taken a closer look at health-trend surveys with a focus on the health indicator used. Our findings reveal that although disability measures often show improvement, there is a simultaneous increase in chronic disease and functional impairments—health components that require care resources. That is, an expansion of other health problems may accompany a compression of disability. Therefore, a concept of general morbidity is not sufficient when discussing health trends and the need for care services in the elderly population. Because different indicators do not show the same trends over time, we suggest a more refined discussion that distinguishes between different health components. In addition, different components have different implications for the amount and kind of care resources needed. If the current positive trends in disability continue, future need for social services and long-term care may not parallel demographic projections. Trends in disease and functional limitations seem to have taken a different direction, suggesting a parallel or increased need for resources in medical care, rehabilitation, and compensatory interventions such as assistive technology.

Key Words: Compression of morbidity • Activities of daily living • Health indicators • Disability




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J Public HealthHome page
S. Fors, C. Lennartsson, and O. Lundberg
Health inequalities among older adults in Sweden 1991-2002
Eur J Public Health, April 1, 2008; 18(2): 138 - 143.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Public HealthHome page
M. McKee
Solidarity in a unified Europe
Eur J Public Health, February 1, 2008; 18(1): 2 - 4.
[Full Text] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All GSA journals Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
Copyright © 2007 by The Gerontological Society of America.