The Gerontologist
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hernandez, M.
Right arrow Articles by Newcomer, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hernandez, M.
Right arrow Articles by Newcomer, R.
The Gerontologist 47:110-117 (2007)
© 2007 The Gerontological Society of America

Assisted Living and Special Populations: What Do We Know About Differences in Use and Potential Access Barriers?

Mauro Hernandez, PhD1 and Robert Newcomer, PhD1

Correspondence: Address correspondence to Mauro Hernandez, PhD, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, 3333 California Street, Suite 455, San Francisco, CA 94118. E-mail: mauro.hernandez{at}ucsf.edu

Purpose: The purpose of this article was to review existing knowledge about assisted living (AL) use by traditionally underserved populations, including people of color, low-income people, and those living in rural communities. Design and Methods: We reviewed methodologies and findings of research on AL and residential care up to June 2004.  Results: Some studies suggested that low-income people and people of color either are less likely to utilize AL or receive AL in settings with less space and amenities and/or lower scores in selected quality measures. Generalizations from national or multistate studies to the population have methodological limitations. Numerous topics remain unstudied, including the pricing of AL, the experience of choosing an AL facility, the presence of discriminatory admission and retention practices, and the role of resident preferences. Data on access to AL in rural areas are inconclusive. Implications: We offer recommendations for national surveys to better classify supportive housing settings. Furthermore, we suggest quantitative and qualitative studies to illuminate the experience of low-income, racial/ethnic minority, and rural populations in AL settings.

Key Words: Aged • Ethnic groups • Income • Home- and community-based services • Residential care • Rural health







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All GSA journals Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
Copyright © 2007 by The Gerontological Society of America.