The Gerontologist
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Cleary, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smith, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Cleary, J.
The Gerontologist 48:25-31 (2008)
© 2008 The Gerontological Society of America

Characterizing Hospice Services in the United States

Maureen A. Smith, MD, PhD1, Christopher Seplaki, PhD2, Mark Biagtan3, Amanda DuPreez, MD4 and James Cleary, MD5

Correspondence: Address correspondence to Dr. Maureen A. Smith, Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 505 WARF Building, 610 Walnut Street, Madison, WI 53726. E-mail: maureensmith{at}wisc.edu

Purpose: Although caregivers desire specific information about hospice programs, there is little descriptive information available. We characterized agencies that provide formal or informal hospice care in the United States according to four types of services considered important by caregivers: medications and treatments; rehabilitative care; emotional, social, and spiritual support; and practical support (e.g., continuous home care). Design and Methods: Data were from the nationally representative 2000 National Home and Hospice Care Survey. We categorized agencies into service mixes reflecting combinations of the four service types by using a grade-of-membership model to score each agency. Results: Of the 11,419 agencies represented in our data, slightly more than half (52%) reflected some mix of services from all four service types. The remaining agencies provided service mixes that reflected relatively few or no services from at least one of the four service types. Specifically, approximately 7% lacked (i.e., had relatively few or no) medications and treatment services, 6% lacked rehabilitative care, 26% lacked emotional/social/spiritual support, and about 10% lacked multiple services. When compared to agencies that reflected a mix of all four services, agencies that lacked multiple services could be distinguished by their lack of formal certification as either a hospice or home health agency. Implications: Few U.S. agencies that provide formal or informal hospice care incorporate a balanced mix of all types of services, but most agencies lack only one type of service. Categorization of agencies based on services that are relevant to caregivers may assist providers in describing hospice care.

Key Words: Hospices • Caregivers • End of life • Spirituality • Social support







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All GSA journals Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
Copyright © 2008 by The Gerontological Society of America.