The Gerontologist
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, C. D.
Right arrow Articles by Sherman, M.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Phillips, C. D.
Right arrow Articles by Sherman, M.
The Gerontologist 48:330-337 (2008)
© 2008 The Gerontological Society of America

To What Degree Does Provider Performance Affect a Quality Indicator? The Case of Nursing Homes and ADL Change

Charles D. Phillips, PhD, MPH1, Min Chen, MS2 and Michael Sherman

Correspondence: Address correspondence to Charles Phillips, PhD, Texas A&M University Health Science Center, School of Rural Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management, 1266 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843-1266. E-mail. [email protected]

Purpose: This research investigates what factors affect the degree to which nursing home performance explains variance in residents' change in status of activities of daily living (ADL) after admission. Design and Methods: The database included all residents admitted in 2002 to a 10% random sample of nursing homes in the United States. Longitudinal analyses of outcomes at 3 months after admission test the ability of individual characteristics and nursing home identifiers to explain variance in ADL change for different groups of residents. Results: As we compared the best and worst providers (top 20% vs bottom 20%, then 10%, then 5%) and we restricted analyses to more homogeneous groups of residents, we found that more of the variance in ADL change was attributable to provider performance. Cognitive function and race also affected the degree to which home performance had an impact on outcomes. Implications: The results imply that some quality indicators may be most useful in distinguishing between nursing homes that provide the best or the worst care. Futhermore, the degree to which a quality indicator is driven by a nursing home's performance may vary considerably, depending on the characteristics of the consumer. These findings raise questions about the usefulness of performance measures that focus on heterogeneous groups of consumers or entire provider populations. "How much of the variance in a quality indicator does provider performance explain?" is an issue we think has not received the attention it deserves in current discussions of performance-measurement strategies and pay-for-performance models.

Key Words: Long-term care • Nursing homes • Pay for performance • Performance measurement • Quality indicators, Quality of care







HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
All GSA journals Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences
Copyright © 2008 by The Gerontological Society of America.