Home
HOME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Services
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
The Gerontologist 42:39-50 (2002)
© 2002 The Gerontological Society of America

A Social–Cognitive Model to Predict the Use of Assistive Devices for Mobility and Self-Care in Elderly People

Marc Roelands, MAa, Paulette Van Oost, PhDa, AnneMarie Depoorter, MDb and Ann Buysse, PhDa

a Ghent University, Faculty of Psychology, Research Group Ageing Studies, Belgium
b Free University of Brussels, Public Health Care, Belgium

Correspondence: Marc Roelands, MA, Ghent University, Faculty of Psychology, Dunantlaan 2, 9000 Ghent, Belgium. E-mail: marc.roelands{at}rug.ac.be.

Decision Editor: Laurence G. Branch, PhD

Purpose: To provide insight into the contribution of psychological variables in understanding use and nonuse of assistive devices (ADs) for self-care and mobility. Design and Methods: A survey on a representative sample of 491 community-dwelling elderly people in Flanders was conducted. A theoretical model of the factors predicting the use of ADs was tested with path analysis. Results: The possession and use of 32 ADs were found to be bivariately related to intention to use ADs, awareness of ADs, attitude toward AD use, subjective norm regarding AD use, self-efficacy concerning AD use, and socio-demographic characteristics. In regression analyses the intention to use ADs was found to be related to self-efficacy concerning AD use, attitude toward AD use, and subjective norm regarding AD use. Implications: This study suggests that a social–cognitive model of human behavior can be helpful in explaining the use of ADs. The model can suggest measures to be developed aiming to improve the introduction of ADs.

Key Words: Socioeconomic status • Self-efficacy • Attitude • Care • Planned behavior




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
GerontologistHome page
M. Kitchener, T. Ng, H. Y. Lee, and C. Harrington
Assistive Technology in Medicaid Home- and Community-Based Waiver Programs
Gerontologist, April 1, 2008; 48(2): 181 - 189.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social ScienceHome page
J. C. Cornman and V. A. Freedman
Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Mobility Device Use in Late Life
J. Gerontol. B. Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci., January 1, 2008; 63(1): S34 - S41.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
GerontologistHome page
S. Becker, H.-W. Wahl, O. Schilling, and D. Burmedi
Assistive Device Use in Visually Impaired Older Adults: Role of Control Beliefs
Gerontologist, December 1, 2005; 45(6): 739 - 746.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Applied GerontologyHome page
J. Cohen-Mansfield, M. A. Creedon, T. B. Malone, M. J. Kirkpatrick III, L. A. Dutra, and R. P. Herman
Electronic Memory Aids for Community-Dwelling Elderly Persons: Attitudes, Preferences, and Potential Utilization
Journal of Applied Gerontology, February 1, 2005; 24(1): 3 - 20.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Applied GerontologyHome page
M. R. Tomita, W. C. Mann, L. F. Fraas, and K. M. Stanton
Predictors of the Use of Assistive Devices that Address Physical Impairments Among Community-Based Frail Elders
Journal of Applied Gerontology, June 1, 2004; 23(2): 141 - 155.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2002 by The Gerontological Society of America.