| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|---|
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
a Sinclair School of Nursing, University of Missouri–Columbia
b School of Medicine, University of Missouri–Columbia
c College of Arts and Science, University of Missouri–Columbia
d School of Nursing, University of Wisconsin–Eau Claire
e College of Nursing, University of Iowa, Iowa City
Correspondence: Marilyn J. Rantz, PhD, RN, FAAN, S422 Nursing School Building, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211. E-mail: RantzM{at}health.missouri.edu.
Decision Editor: Eleanor S. McConnell, RN, PhD
Purpose: The purpose of the study was to determine if simply providing nursing facilities with comparative quality performance information and education about quality improvement would improve clinical practices and subsequently improve resident outcomes, or if a stronger inter-vention, expert clinical consultation with nursing facility staff, is needed. Design and Methods: Nursing facilities (n = 113) were randomly assigned to one of three groups: workshop and feedback reports only, workshop and feedback reports with clinical consultation, and control. Minimum Data Set (MDS) Quality Indicator (QI) feedback reports were prepared and sent quarterly to each facility in intervention groups for a year. Clinical consultation by a gerontological clinical nurse specialist (GCNS) was offered to those in the second group. Results: With the exception of MDS QI 27 (little or no activity), no significant differences in resident assessment measures were detected between the groups of facilities. However, outcomes of residents in nursing homes that actually took advantage of the clinical consultation of the GCNS demonstrated trends in improvements in QIs measuring falls, behavioral symptoms, little or no activity, and pressure ulcers (overall and for low-risk residents). Implications: Simply providing comparative performance feedback is not enough to improve resident outcomes. It appears that only those nursing homes that sought the additional intensive support of the GCNS were able to effect enough change in clinical practice to improve resident outcomes significantly.
Key Words: MDS data • Nursing homes • Outcomes
This article has been cited by other articles:
|
|
 |
|
  E. A. Miller and V. Mor Balancing Regulatory Controls and Incentives: Toward Smarter and More Transparent Oversight in Long-Term Care Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, January 1, 2008; 33(2): 249 - 279. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. J. Rantz, D. R. Mehr, L. Hicks, J. Scott-Cawiezell, G. F. Petroski, R. W. Madsen, R. Porter, and M. Zwygart-Stauffacher Entrepreneurial program of research and service to improve nursing home care. West J Nurs Res, December 1, 2006; 28(8): 918 - 934. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. T.H. Wan, N. J. Zhang, and L. Unruh Predictors of resident outcome improvement in nursing homes. West J Nurs Res, December 1, 2006; 28(8): 974 - 993. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 G. Arling, R. L. Kane, T. Lewis, and C. Mueller Future Development of Nursing Home Quality Indicators Gerontologist, April 1, 2005; 45(2): 147 - 156. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J. A. Lucas, T. Avi-Itzhak, J. P. Robinson, C. G. Morris, M. J. Koren, and S. C. Reinhard Continuous Quality Improvement as an Innovation: Which Nursing Facilities Adopt It? Gerontologist, February 1, 2005; 45(1): 68 - 77. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 R. H. Lee and L. Wendling The Extent of Quality Improvement Activities in Nursing Homes American Journal of Medical Quality, November 1, 2004; 19(6): 255 - 265. [Abstract] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. R. Jones, R. Fink, G. Pepper, E. Hutt, C. P. Vojir, J. Scott, L. Clark, and K. Mellis Improving Nursing Home Staff Knowledge and Attitudes About Pain Gerontologist, August 1, 2004; 44(4): 469 - 478. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. J. Rantz, L. Hicks, V. Grando, G. F. Petroski, R. W. Madsen, D. R. Mehr, V. Conn, M. Zwygart-Staffacher, J. Scott, M. Flesner, et al. Nursing Home Quality, Cost, Staffing, and Staff Mix Gerontologist, February 1, 2004; 44(1): 24 - 38. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. J. Rantz, L. Hicks, G. F. Petroski, R. W. Madsen, D. R. Mehr, V. Conn, M. Zwygart-Staffacher, and M. Maas Stability and Sensitivity of Nursing Home Quality Indicators J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci., January 1, 2004; 59(1): M79 - 82. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. J. Lowe, J. A. Lucas, N. G. Castle, J. P. Robinson, and S. Crystal Consumer Satisfaction in Long-Term Care: State Initiatives in Nursing Homes and Assisted Living Facilities Gerontologist, December 1, 2003; 43(6): 883 - 896. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. J. Rantz, A. Vogelsmeier, P. Manion, D. Minner, B. Markway, V. Conn, M. A. Aud, and D. R. Mehr Statewide Strategy to Improve Quality of Care in Nursing Facilities Gerontologist, April 1, 2003; 43(2): 248 - 258. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|---|
| All GSA journals | Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences | Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences |
